Respondent No.1 is directed to re-consider the application of the petitioner for re-registration on merits was upheld by the High Court Of Delhi th
Respondent No.1 is directed to re-consider the application of the petitioner for re-registration on merits was upheld by the High Court Of Delhi th
In the case of SHREE MULUND STALL HOLDERS AND OWNERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION v/s MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI Appeal from Order No. 217 of 2
The defendant has filed this second appeal assailing the judgment and decree dated 10.12.2002 passed by the Additional District Judge, Jaipur in ci
The Review Petition No. 6 of 2022 is directed against the judgment and order passed in Writ Petition No. 3959 of 2020 which was made by the present
This Court does not find any error in the Order dated 1st November, 2013, whereby the right of residence was granted in favour of the Respondent wa
This Court does not find any cogent reason to allow the operation of the impugned Order dated 17th March, 2018 passed by learned Special Judge in R
The instant has been filed under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by the Appellant/accused against the judgment of conviction da
Respondent/BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. is directed to grant an electricity connection to the petitioners, subject to petitioners complying with the re
This Court is not adjudicating on the said issue as it is not the subject matter of the Transfer Petition was upheld by the High Court Of Delhi thr
The petitioner has an alternative remedy for issuance of writ of mandamus to remove the encroachment under the provisions of the Bihar Public Land