The Revisional Court had limited powers while exercising its jurisdiction: High Court Of Delhi
This Court does not find any cogent reason to allow the operation of the impugned Order dated 17th March, 2018 passed by learned Special Judge in R
In light of the circumstances, the court finds substance to reduce the substantive sentence inflicted on the accused: High Court of Delhi
The instant has been filed under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by the Appellant/accused against the judgment of conviction da
Mere pendency of the Civil Suit would not be a ground to disentitle the petitioners from obtaining an electricity connection in their name: High Court Of Delhi
Respondent/BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. is directed to grant an electricity connection to the petitioners, subject to petitioners complying with the re
The power of a Chairman of the Tribunal under Section 25 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 is purely an administrative power: High Court Of Delhi
This Court is not adjudicating on the said issue as it is not the subject matter of the Transfer Petition was upheld by the High Court Of Delhi thr
Present petition is in the nature of private interest litigation and not public interest litigation: High Court of Patna
The petitioner has an alternative remedy for issuance of writ of mandamus to remove the encroachment under the provisions of the Bihar Public Land
The intention was not to commit the murder of the deceased but the same had occurred in an attempt to commit theft: High Court Of Bombay
The accused appellant Sunil Kharwar is convicted for offence punishable under section 397 of the Indian Penal Code and is sentenced to suffer 10 ye
Power vests with the Central Government in terms of Section 15 of the Architects Act of 1972 to recognise a degree awarded by a Foreign University: HIGH COURT OF DELHI
The power ultimately vests with the Central Government in consultation with the respondent No.1 in terms of Section 15 of the Act of 1972 to recogn
The conviction of the appellant recorded by the Trial Court under Section 302 IPC is set aside: HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
There is a reasonable doubt in the case of the prosecution and it is not proper to uphold the conviction of the appellant on the basis of aforesaid
Electricity connection be granted in accordance with law: HIGH COURT OF DELHI
The petitioner is directed to furnish an undertaking and comply with the requirements of the respondent to maintain safe distance between the prope
The Tribunal has not committed any error in returning a finding of negligence on the part of the driver of the Trolla: HIGH COURT OF DELHI
No infirmity in the impugned award, and consequently no merit in the appeal was upheld by the HIGH COURT OF DELHI through the learned bench led by
