Case summary- Lakshmi Kant Pandey v. Union of India
February 6, 2023by Primelegal Team
In this Public Interest Litigation case, the Apex Court took into account allegations of negligence and misconduct on the part of adoption agencie
Madras High Court held that welfare legislation Maternity Benefits Act cannot be denied merely on the basis of technicalities
January 18, 2023by Primelegal Team
Madras High court In this a writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order of the learned Single Jud
Whether, the claim of the Union regarding 40 workers as per list enclosed should be treated as regular workers of Paradip Port Trust and paid regular wages at par with the similar worker of Paradip Port Trust Management. If so, to what relief the workers are entitled and from which date? – Odisha High Court
January 5, 2023by Primelegal Team
On 31st August 2007 the Odisha High Court passed a Judgement relating to the case of Paradip Post Trust and General Secretary. And the Judgement wa
The car, came from the opposite direction and dashed against the rickshaw. As a result of the accident, the claimant received serious injuries over several parts of his body and remained as an indoor patient at Sakhigopal Hospital. It was found that his left leg and the right collar bone were fractured. He alleged that he became invalid and members of his family have been deprived of his earnings as a rickshaw puller. Claim of Rs. 22,000/- as compensation was laid before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal at Puri. – Odisha High Court.
January 5, 2023by Primelegal Team
On 30th April 1976, the Odisha High Court passed a judgement in relation to Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and The Insurance Act, 1938. This Judgement wa
AIADMK Minister M. Manikandan was arrested from Bengluru by Chennai city Police After his anticipatory bail got rejected by Madras High Court.
January 5, 2023by Primelegal Team
Madras High Court In this case AIADMK minister got arrested after the complaint got filed against him by a Malaysian Women to whom the minister had
Statements of the petitioners recorded under Section 164, Cr. P.C., since not relied upon by the prosecution, if of no consequence to grant any benefit from that to any of the accused persons. This fact if necessary, may be brought to the notice of the trial Court at the time of trial of the murder case.– Odisha High Court.
January 4, 2023by Primelegal Team
On 27th January 1999, The Odisha High Court passed a judgement in relation to Jogendra Nahak And Ors. vs State Of Orissa And Ors. (1999) 16 OCR 2
The Court held the contemnors guilty of contempt of the Court and even though they tendered unconditional and unqualified apologies, there was not even a remote or genuine apology for the statement/publications made by some of them. – Odisha High Court
January 4, 2023by Primelegal Team
On 3rd April, 1951 the Odisha High Court Passed a Judgement where the contemnors guilty of contempt of the Court. The judgement was passed by Justi
That right was not absolute and may be lawfully restricted for prevention of crime, disorder or protection of health or morals or protection of rights and freedom of others.- Odisha High Court
January 3, 2023by Primelegal Team
On 20th July 2004 the High Court of Odisha Passed a Judgement with regard to whether a direction can be issued for conducting DNA test and blood gr
State’s decision to exclude private sector employees from BH-series registration for vehicles is erroneous: Karnataka High Court
January 3, 2023by Primelegal Team
The Karnataka High Court passed a judgement on 16.12.22 quashing the State’s decision to exclude Private Sector employees From BH-Series Registra
This is a contempt proceeding brought against the former Chief Minister of Orissa, Sri Naba Krishna Choudhury, for a speech he gave in the Orissa Legislative Assembly on March 8, 1956. On 10-3-1956, an excerpt from the speech was published in the local daily ‘Matrubhumi’. The Editor, Printer, and Publisher of the said daily were also summoned to show cause why they should not be imprisoned for contempt, but they both offered an unqualified apology. – Odisha High Court.
January 3, 2023by Primelegal Team
The Odisha High Court on 26.02.1958 passed a judgement for the proceeding for contempt started against the former Chief Minister of Orissa, Sri Nab
