Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The offence of rape can be permitted to be compounded to promote of family life of complainant and accused: Andhra Pradesh High Court
The offence of rape can be permitted to be compounded to promote of family life of complainant and accused: Andhra Pradesh High Court
March 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Andhra Pradesh High Court issued an order on 4th January, 2023 in which it held that the offence under sec 376 of IPC can be compounded to prom

Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan is an important case regarding the basic structure of our Indian constitution. As they make up the majority of the Indian Constitution, there are several essential aspects of the Indian Constitution that cannot be altered. According to Judge Khanna, the fundamental rights that have been accorded to all nationals are the main benefits. Under Article 368 of the Indian Constitution, the Parliament has the authority to change any provision of the Constitution, including the Fundamental Rights.
Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan is an important case regarding the basic structure of our Indian constitution. As they make up the majority of the Indian Constitution, there are several essential aspects of the Indian Constitution that cannot be altered. According to Judge Khanna, the fundamental rights that have been accorded to all nationals are the main benefits. Under Article 368 of the Indian Constitution, the Parliament has the authority to change any provision of the Constitution, including the Fundamental Rights.
March 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Facts of the Case: By putting certain actions approved by State Legislatures in the Ninth Schedule under Article 31B of the Seventeenth Amendment A

In the Indian legal system, AK Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950) is a defining case. The case gave the Indian judiciary a chance to interpret the Fundamental Rights of the Constitution more broadly. Several clauses from the Indian Constitution’s Chapter on Fundamental Rights are being scrutinized for the first time in this case before the Supreme Court. The crucial points 19, 21, and 22 were addressed in this instance.
In the Indian legal system, AK Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950) is a defining case. The case gave the Indian judiciary a chance to interpret the Fundamental Rights of the Constitution more broadly. Several clauses from the Indian Constitution’s Chapter on Fundamental Rights are being scrutinized for the first time in this case before the Supreme Court. The crucial points 19, 21, and 22 were addressed in this instance.
March 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Facts: According to the 1950 Preventive Detention Act, A.K. Gopalan was detained. He claims that he has been detained since 1947 without being put

Non-occupancy Charges, Transfer Charges Common Amenity Fund Charges and Other Charges, Are Exempt From Income Tax Act Based on the Principle of Mutuality: The Supreme Court
March 6, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Supreme Court in the case of ITO v. Venkatesh Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. (2018) 402 ITR 670/163 DTR 465/301 CTR 514/254 Taxman 313 (SC)

The question of whether the enshrined rights in the constitution i.e the fundamental rights can be amenable in nature by the Parliament was raised in the landmark Golaknath case. This case is a landmark case in the history of the Judiciary of India. Golaknath vs State of Punjab, 1967, Supreme Court of India, AIR 1967 SCR (2) 762. The court also looked up on a major issue of whether the amendment of 1951 which was the First amendment act 1951 is ultra vires or not?
The question of whether the enshrined rights in the constitution i.e the fundamental rights can be amenable in nature by the Parliament was raised in the landmark Golaknath case. This case is a landmark case in the history of the Judiciary of India. Golaknath vs State of Punjab, 1967, Supreme Court of India, AIR 1967 SCR (2) 762. The court also looked up on a major issue of whether the amendment of 1951 which was the First amendment act 1951 is ultra vires or not?
March 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Important Aspects to Consider: The Indian National Congress and the Indian Nationalist Movement were founded on the demand for fundamental rights,

One of the cases which is referred to as the landmark case in the history of the Judiciary of India is the Keshavnanda Bharathi case. This case has upheld the basic structure of the Constitution and this case has paved an outline for the same. Keshavnanda Bharathi vs State of Kerala, 1973, 4 SCC 225; AIR 1973 SC 1461, Supreme Court of India. The court for the protection of the Parliament and citizens of the country came up with basic structure doctrine of the Constitution.
One of the cases which is referred to as the landmark case in the history of the Judiciary of India is the Keshavnanda Bharathi case. This case has upheld the basic structure of the Constitution and this case has paved an outline for the same. Keshavnanda Bharathi vs State of Kerala, 1973, 4 SCC 225; AIR 1973 SC 1461, Supreme Court of India. The court for the protection of the Parliament and citizens of the country came up with basic structure doctrine of the Constitution.
March 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Facts of the Case: The leader of the religious cult Edneer Mutt in Kerala’s Kasaragod district was Keshvananda Bharati. In the sect, Keshvana

The landmark judgment of the Indian Judiciary highlighting the importance of grave and sudden provocation, State of Maharashtra vs KM.Nanavati, 1961, Supreme Court of India, AIR 112, 1961 SCR(1) 497. The case of KM. Nanavati was the last case which was taken up for the trial of the jury. And ever since the case had been delivered the judgment the Government of India took steps towards abolishing the system of the jury and it has successfully abolished the same.
March 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Facts of the Case: Sylvia was the wife of the petitioner KM. Nanavati and both wife and husband along with their children moved to Bombay. KM. Nana

The historic event of the programme of the reservation in the country India with the ruling of the Srimathi Champakam Case by the Supreme Court of India. (Supreme Court -1951) State of Madra vs Srimathi Champakam AIR 1951 SC 226. The directive from the government was held nullified and declared to be void by the Supreme Court in this judgment and this judgment differentiates the “Directive Principles of the state policy and the Fundamental Rights”.
March 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Facts of the Case: In the year 1950 in Madras, in a college there was an entrance for the students to get their seats in the college. There was a s

THOUGH DOCTORS’ AURA OF GODLINESS AND HOLINESS IS A MYTH, THEY ARE VOLUNTEERS WHO TAKE THE RISK OF DEALING WITH THE MOST INTRICATE, DELICATE, AND COMPLEX MACHINE ON EARTH – THE HUMAN BODY : KERALA HIGH COURT
THOUGH DOCTORS’ AURA OF GODLINESS AND HOLINESS IS A MYTH, THEY ARE VOLUNTEERS WHO TAKE THE RISK OF DEALING WITH THE MOST INTRICATE, DELICATE, AND COMPLEX MACHINE ON EARTH – THE HUMAN BODY : KERALA HIGH COURT
February 28, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The High Court of Kerala passed a judgment on   2 February 2023 stating the importance of doctors as well the amount of trust people keep on them

Sandeep Kudale of the Congress was charged after postings on social media criticising Chandrakant Patil of the BJP were dismissed by the Bombay High Court.
Sandeep Kudale of the Congress was charged after postings on social media criticising Chandrakant Patil of the BJP were dismissed by the Bombay High Court.
February 27, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Sandeep Kudale, a member of the Congress party, was the subject of two FIRs that the Bombay High Court dismissed on Monday. The court also ordered

document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() { var links = document.querySelectorAll('a'); links.forEach(function(link) { if (link.innerHTML.trim() === 'Career' && link.href === 'https://primelegal.in/contact-us/') { link.href = 'https://primelegal.in/career/'; } }); });