Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Section 83 does not provide for delegation or authorization; instead, it serves to preserve the government’s interests.: Bombay High Court
April 21, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Section 83 expressly prohibits any delegation or permission. The Commissioner’s view, as contemplated by Section 83 of the MGST Act, that it

Articles published in news portal “Newslaundry” neither qualify as goods nor as service as defined under Section 2(j) and 2(z) of the Trademark Act: High Court Of Bombay
April 21, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Mere use of the registered trade mark of the Sakal Media Group in articles authored by the petitioner and published by the news portal Newslaundry,

The case of the prosecution cannot be rejected solely on the ground of delay in lodging the FIR: Sikkim High Court
April 21, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The delay in lodging the FIR is concerned, the delay in a case of sexual assault, cannot be equated with the case involving other offences. There a

Dismissal of complaint u/S 203 Cr.P.C if no substantial evidence is adduced: Delhi High Court
Dismissal of complaint u/S 203 Cr.P.C if no substantial evidence is adduced: Delhi High Court
April 21, 2021by Primelegal Team0

In matter surrounding requirement of evidence u/S 203 of Cr.P.C., the bench constituting Suresh Kumar Kait J. of the Delhi High Court has concluded

Recourse to Article 224A, not a substitute for regular appointments: Supreme Court of India
April 21, 2021by Primelegal Team0

We clarify that if recommendations have not been made for more than 20% of the regular vacancies then the trigger for recourse to Article224A would

It is important to order provisional attachment to protect the interest of government revenue: Supreme Court of India
April 21, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The expression “necessary so to do for protecting the government revenue” implicates that the interests of the government revenue cannot be pro

The court dismissed the bail order after finding irrelevant considerations: Supreme Court of India
April 21, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The relevant factors which should have been taken into consideration while dealing with the application for bail have not been taken note of, or ba

Affinity test may not be regarded as a litmus test for establishing the link of the applicant with a scheduled tribe: Bombay High Court
April 21, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Rejection of claim of petitioners on the ground of failure to establish cultural affinity is absolutely unwarranted such findings cannot be legally

Passing Off claim rejected, Serum Institue’s ‘Covishield’ cannot be confused with hand sanitizers bearing the same name: Bombay High Court
April 21, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Order of injunction in passing off cases ensures that no one should present his goods and services to the customers as of another party with goodwi

Provision of one trial against a person for multiple offences under Section 138 of the Act committed within a period of 12 months: Supreme Court
April 20, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Concerned with the large number of cases filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 pending at various levels, a Division Benc