Court of Appeal cannot indulge in fact-finding of first instance in any given case: Delhi High Court
It is undisputed that a court that acts under an appellate jurisdiction cannot indulge in the fact-finding procedure of trial courts. This accepted
Health insurance claim agents to be considered as rendering essential services whilst lockdown: Delhi High Court
The present petition before the Delhi High Court deals with mobility issues arising out of the current Covid-19 scenario in India where numerous st
Useless Formality theory is an exception and must not be readily resorted in all cases: High Court of Delhi
The right of a person in detention to consult a legal practitioner of his choice is a right guaranteed by the Constitution of India and it is not o
Sub-rule (9) of Rule-6 of the High Court of Orissa (Designation of Senior Advocate) Rules, 2019 is ultra-vires: High Court of Orissa
Hon’ble the Supreme Court in paragraph- 73.4 of Indira Jaising case has ipse dixit not stated anything about the pick through suo motu source. Su
Mere recovery of tainted money without any proof of demand not sufficient to constitute the offence punishable U/S. 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act: Jharkhand High Court
Illegal gratification is a sine qua non to constitute the said offence and mere recovery of currency notes cannot constitute the offence under Sect
Officers invested with powers U/S.53 of the NDPS Act are “police officers” within the meaning of S.25 IEA: Jharkhand High Court
Officers who have been given powers under section 53 of the NDPS Act are “police officers” within the scope of section 25 of the Eviden
No evidence adduced by the defence to prove false implication of the appellants, hence conviction stands justified: Chhattisgarh High Court
It stands proved beyond all reasonable doubt that it is the accused/appellants who, quarreled with the complainant, abused him filthily in the name
If material on record is a brazen attempt to persecute an innocent person, imperative upon Court to prevent abuse of process of law: Supreme Court
The High Court has committed jurisdictional error by not entertaining the revision petition on merits and overlooking the fact that ‘discharge’
‘Registrar’ does not fall into the category of ‘A person authorized by Central Government’: Karnataka High Court
‘Registrar’ and ‘a person authorized by Central Government’ are two different entities and entitling the Registrar with the power to presen
Motor-cycle taxis are a form of contract carriages and must be granted permit: Karnataka High Court
Motor vehicle taxis that provide transport services for hire or reward are well within the definition of “contract carriage” under the Motor Ve
