Preventive Detention cannot be used as a substitute for ordinary law: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
Preventive detention involves detaining a person without trial to prevent him from committing a crime in the future based on his past record with t
Purpose of detaining accused person is to secure attendance, not punishment: High Court of Uttarakhand
Detaining someone who has not been convicted by a competent court would compromise on the personal liberty which Indian law guarantees. This is why
Rule will be struck down, if it exceeds the authority conferred by the enabling act: Karnataka High Court
The provision has to conform to the statute under which the Rule is made and exceeding the limits of the authority conferred by the enabling Act is
There is a need for continuous monitoring of the implementation of the schemes in favour of the affected children: Supreme Court
The Court permitted the learned Amicus Curiae to have a dialogue with Nodal Officers to be appointed by the State Governments to ascertain the info
Refusal of bail is a restriction on the personal liberty of the individual, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India: The High Court of Uttarakhand
The object of keeping the accused person in detention during the trial is not punishment. The main purpose is manifestly to secure the attendance o
The right to wages is an integral part of the right to livelihood and is entitled to protection under Art.21: Orissa High Court
The legislative scheme of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act places the “Right to Livelihood” at a higher pedestal than
The High Court is not and cannot act as a second court of the first appeal: Orissa High Court
It is very disconcerting that the High Court functioned as a disciplinary appeal authority and even re-evaluated the evidence before the investigat
Appellant granted bail to attend father’s last rites: The High Court of Jharkhand
Appellant granted bail to attend the last rites of his father who lost his life due to covid-19. The above mentioned was a gesture of sympathy show
S.147 of the Motors Vehicles Act, 1988 covers death or bodily injury to even gratuitous passenger: Karnataka High Court
Section 147 of the MV Act, 1988 ensures that an Insurance Policy covering Third-party risk is not required to exclude gratuitous passengers in a ve
Compensation for serious injuries should consider how it will affect the victim in the future: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
When a serious injury has been inflicted upon a person, the compensation granted to him needs to include aspects like whether the injury will worse
