Supreme Court rules against the wrongful denial of employment of coal mine workers.
Case title: Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. V. Brajrajnagar Coal Mines Workers’ Union. Case no.: CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4092-4093/2024 Decided on: 12.04.20
A mere breach of contract would not attract prosecution for Criminal offence in every case: Supreme Court.
Case title: Naresh Kumar and Anr. vs State of Karnataka and Anr. Case no.: SLP (CRL.) NO. 1570 OF 2021 Decided on: 12.04.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Jus
A notice to terminate the contract cannot be issued unilaterally by one party without the adjudication of the Court: Jharkhand High Court
Case title – M/s Aditya and Rashmi Construction Pvt. Ltd. VS The State of Jharkhand & Ors Case no. – W.P. (C) No. 2924 of 2014 Decision on
Assessing Officer not entitled to make additions again, when the same had been deleted by the CIT(A): Bombay High Court
Case title – CCIT (OSD)/Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax VS Bhupendra Champaklal Dalal Case no. – Income Tax Appeal No.1491 OF 2019 (A.Y. 1989-19
Supreme Court makes distinction between Culpable Homicide and Murder, sets aside conviction u/s 302 of IPC.
Case title: Shahid Ali vs State of Uttar Pradesh Case no.: SLP (Criminal) No(s). 9454 of 2021 Decided on: 11.03.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice Sati
Right to live a life with dignity cannot be put in jeopardy on the basis of half-baked evidence: Supreme Court.
Case title: Nirmal Premkumar and Anr. vs State Rep. By Inspector of Police Case no.: Criminal Appeal No. 1098 OF 2024 Decided on: 11.03.2024 Quor
Conflicting marks must be read in its entirety; No Exclusive Rights on the use of generic term like ‘Dish’: Delhi High Court
Case title – Prasar Bharti VS Dish TV India Ltd. Case no. – FAO (OS) (COMM) 267/2019 before the High Court of New Delhi Decision on –
The Decision of Allahabad High Court ‘Smacks of arbitrariness and perversity’: Supreme Court quashed the hasty order of HC
Case title – Suneeta Devi VS Avinash and others Case no. – Civil Appeal No(s). OF 2024 (Arising out of SLP (C) No(s). 20422 of 2019) Decisi
Compliance of requisites under Section 36A of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code mandatory for conveyance of land from tribal to non-tribal person: Supreme Court
Case title – Babasaheb Dhondiba Kute VS Radhu Vithoba Barde Case no. – Civil Appeal No. OF 2024 [@ SLP(C) No.29462 OF 2019] Decision on
Bombay High Court: Tendering Authority’s actions are arbitrary in GST matters
Case Title: M/s. H.P.Ghumare versus The state of Maharashtra, The Principal Secretary, The District Collector and The Resident Deputy Collector. Ca
