Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Courts cannot use the power under Section 311 to fill in the lacunae in the prosecution evidence: Bombay High Court
Courts cannot use the power under Section 311 to fill in the lacunae in the prosecution evidence: Bombay High Court
July 14, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The power given to the court under section 311 of the CrPC where at any stage of the inquiry, trial or other proceeding may summon any person as a

Doctors cannot be put to criminal prosecution for negligence during the Pandemic: Chhattisgarh High Court
July 14, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Doctors have put themselves through extraordinary situations to treat and serve people during a situation of chaos amidst the ongoing Covid-19 Pand

No party can be permitted to unilaterally appoint an Arbitrator: High Court of Delhi.
July 14, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Where one party unilaterally appoints an arbitrator, it defeats the purpose of unbiased adjudication of disputes between the parties. A single judg

Mere examination of the appellant herein cannot be considered as a change in circumstance: Supreme Court
July 14, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The High Court merely classifying the appellant as the principal star witness and referring to her statement is of no consequence since the entire

The respondent is not expected to obtain any information from the stock exchanges for the sole purpose of providing the same to an applicant under the RTI Act. : Appellate Authority, SEBI.
July 14, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The appellate authority under the RTI (Right to Information) Act of the Securities and Exchange Board of India comprising of Mr. Anand Baiwar adjud

It is understood that the respondent is not supposed to create information; or to interpret information; or to furnish clarification to the appellant under the ambit of the RTI Act.: SEBI.
July 14, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The appellate authority under the RTI (Right to Information) Act of the Securities and Exchange Board of India comprising of Mr. Anand Baiwar adjud

The petitioner was tried under Sections 364-A, 328, 420, 468, 471, 473 and 34 IPC : High court of Punjab and Haryana 
July 13, 2021by Primelegal Team0

A petition in the nature of mandamus has been filed under article 226/227 of the constitution of India in order to direct the respondents to releas

Counsel for the petitioner restricts his prayer qua issuance of directions to the appropriate authority to pass an order on the application: High court of Punjab and Haryana
July 13, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The petitioner has filed for a criminal writ petition i.e. “A writ is defined as a formal written order issued by a higher court which requests

Service rendered by a daily wage employee does not qualify for pension: Patna High Court
July 13, 2021by Primelegal Team0

A daily wage worker who works for the state government in any capacity rendering any service is not eligible for pension since such a service id de

Right of Nomination does not override the right of heirs: Chhattisgarh High Court
July 13, 2021by Primelegal Team0

A nominee under a Hire Purchase Agreement cannot be accepted as the owner when the legal heirs according to the Hindu Succession act are still sust