Courts are supposed to decide cases on merits and not on technicalities: High Court of Uttarakhand.
The liberal approach has to be adopted in such matters to do complete justice between the parties, particularly in cases where the other side can b
The accused is not legally entitled to cross examine the scientific expert who made report on record: High Court of Jharkhand
An order cannot be quashed on grounds that the scientific expert who drafted a report on record was not called to court and cross-examined by the p
“The appellant was also advised to refer to the website for updated information from time to time.”: SEBI, Part 3.
In this context, it was noted that in the matter of Shri S. C. Sharma vs. CPIO, Securities and Exchange Board of India (Decision dated August 30, 2
“The appellant was also advised to refer to the website for updated information from time to time.”: SEBI, Part 2.
It was noted that the appellant sought reasons for default of brokers. On perusal of the query, it appears that the same is in the nature of seekin
Arbitration proceeding to be disposed by the dist. Judge on its own merits and cannot be interfered by the parties: High Court of Bombay at Goa
A challenge petition is preferred by the petitioner against the order passed by the Dist. judge granting the stay to the execution of award. It w
The court does not inspire confidence with regard to their innocence and rejects pre-arrest bail to the petitioners arrested under Sections 304-B/34 IPC: High court of Patna
The petitioners were arrested under Section 304-B, “Dowry death”, section 34IPC, “Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common inten
The Court declined to reconsider the prayer for bail as the petitioner was arrested under Sections 25(1-B)(a)/26/35 of the Arms Act,1959.: High court of Patna
The petitioner was held in custody under Sections 25(1-B) (a) Arms Act, 1959, “acquires, has in his possession or carries any firearm or ammuniti
Petitioner who is a married person and has children to support, need not be kept in incarceration when his presence during trial can be ensured by stringent terms and conditions: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh
In most of the cases it is not possible to prove agreement between the conspirators by direct evidence but the same can be inferred from the circum
Merely because there is land dispute between the parties, the conviction of the petitioners cannot be interfered : Jharkhand High Court
Convictions cannot be overturned when there is cogent and consistent materials on record, to sustain the conviction of the petitioners. This was he
When matter is amicably settled between the parties, the complainants should be permitted to compound such offences against the applicants: High Court of Uttarakhand.
Where the petitioner and respondent had amicably settled the dispute and the complainants do not want to prosecute the petitioner further, therefor
