THE WRIT PETITION AND THE MANDAMUS SOUGHT FOR IS ISSUED: HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
The HIGH COURT OF MADRAS in the Writ petition Nos. 5459, 5463 & 5465 of 2022 in the case of HI-TECH ARAI PRIVATE LIMITED v. TANGEDCO, THE CHIEF
No writ in the nature of a mandamus can be issued if there is no failure to perform a mandatory duty: High Court of Patna
Powers of the High Court under Article 226 are not strictly confined to the limits to which proceedings for prerogative writs are subject in Englis
A petition can be dismissed on the ground of unexplained delay and laches: High Court of Patna
While exercising its jurisdiction under Article 226, the Court is duty-bound to consider whether adjudication of writ petition involves any complex
Petitioner is allowed to travel to UAE and Thailand for business purpose subjected to some conditions stated by the Court : High Court of Delhi
Court is inclined to allow the present application and permit the petitioner to travel to UAE and Thailand, with a further direction that he shall
Learned counsel for the respondents have not stated that the petitioner has misused the permission granted by this Court to the petitioner to visit UAE and UK: High Court Of Delhi
Upon the petitioner returning to India, in terms of the above order, the surety furnished by the petitioner would be duly returned to him or the su
Petition is disposed of with liberty to respondent to approach AT-MCD in accordance with law : High Court of Delhi
Petitioner seeks a direction against the respondent-Corporation to demolish the alleged unauthorized structure raised by respondent no. 2 and 3 and
According to Section 83(2) of the CGST Act, every provisional attachment order ceases to have effect after the expiry of a period of one year from the date the order was passed: High Court Of Delhi
The impugned provisional attachment order/letter is no longer effective. Accordingly, the Court directed the Respondent to defreeze the bank accoun
For an offence of sodomy under POCSO Act, the victim should be below 18 years and accused should be guilty u/s 377 of the IPC: High Court of Delhi
In order to bring home the guilt of accused within the ambit of Section 6 of the POCSO Act, it was incumbent for the prosecution to prove that the
Order XXXVIII Rule 5 of the CPC cannot be used to convert an unsecured debt into a secured debt: High Court of Delhi
Order XXXVIII Rule 5 of the CPC have to be used sparingly and strictly in accordance with the said Rule and it cannot be used to convert an unsecur
Indian law prescribes different processes for termination for misconduct and termination for unsatisfactory performance: High Court of Sikkim
The unsatisfactory performance involves an error of judgment, carelessness or mere negligence in performing a duty, while misconduct is more than a
