Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The Court observes that there can be no dispute about the fact that insofar as incentive applications which were filed during the period when the incentive scheme was in operation, the incentives would have to be processed and disbursed, in terms of the said scheme: Delhi High Court
The Court observes that there can be no dispute about the fact that insofar as incentive applications which were filed during the period when the incentive scheme was in operation, the incentives would have to be processed and disbursed, in terms of the said scheme: Delhi High Court
February 16, 2023by Primelegal Team0

W.P.(C) 2619/2020 RASHTRIYE BHAWAN NIRMAN SANGH v. DELHI BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS WELFARE BOARD (LABOUR DEPARTMENT) THROUGH SECRETA

Mutual consultation has to be explored. If the same does not fructify, an adjudicator has to be appointed: Delhi High Court
Mutual consultation has to be explored. If the same does not fructify, an adjudicator has to be appointed: Delhi High Court
February 16, 2023by Primelegal Team0

W.P.(C) 1926/2023 FANS A.S. v. MEJA URJA NIGAM PRIVATE LIMITED The Petitioner (Fans A.S) is a company incorporated under the laws of the Czech Repu

Delay in release of convict is a violation under Article 21: Punjab High Court.
Delay in release of convict is a violation under Article 21: Punjab High Court.
February 16, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Punjab High Court in Jagjit Singh & Ors v/s State of Punjab (CRM-22778-2022 IN CRM-11339-2022) held that delay in release of the convict, a

Matrimonial cases to be accommodated to one day in one calendar month for the husband/ family members on request of transfer of case by the wife: Punjab High Court.
Matrimonial cases to be accommodated to one day in one calendar month for the husband/ family members on request of transfer of case by the wife: Punjab High Court.
February 16, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Punjab High Court passed an order on 17th August, 2022 in Ashima Khetarpal v/s Dinesh Setia (TA-827-2021 (O&M), stating that on request of

Non-citizens cannot be appointed guardian of persons with disabilities: Delhi High Court
Non-citizens cannot be appointed guardian of persons with disabilities: Delhi High Court
February 16, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Delhi HC passed a judgement on 13th February, 2023. This was seen in the case of   SUNIL PODAR Vs. THE NATIONAL TRUST FOR WELFARE OF PERSON W

LOC Can’t Be Issued In Routine Manner, Mere Suspicion Of Not Returning To India After Travel No Basis To Deny Permission To Travel Abroad: Delhi HC
LOC Can’t Be Issued In Routine Manner, Mere Suspicion Of Not Returning To India After Travel No Basis To Deny Permission To Travel Abroad: Delhi HC
February 16, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Delhi High court passed a judgement on 9TH February, 2023. This was seen in the case of   SANDEEP SINGH DESWAL v. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELH

Bombay High Court: There is no basis for the AO to believe that income subject to tax evaded assessment.
Bombay High Court: There is no basis for the AO to believe that income subject to tax evaded assessment.
February 15, 2023by Primelegal Team0

According to the Bombay High Court, the development agreement only allowed for licensee construction on the land and had no bearing on the transfer

Treating girls like commodities Mother “selling” her 1-year-old in the 21st century is against morality and human rights : Bombay High Court
Treating girls like commodities Mother “selling” her 1-year-old in the 21st century is against morality and human rights : Bombay High Court
February 15, 2023by Primelegal Team0

In the case of Ashwini Sanjay Babar v. State of Maharashtra ( Criminal Bail Application No. 364 of 2023 ), it was observed by Justice SM Modak that

The opportunity to cross-examination, unless there has been an absolute laxity on the part of the petitioner/defendant, ought not to have been denied inasmuch as the right to cross-examine is an indelible right of party before the Civil Court: Delhi High Court
The opportunity to cross-examination, unless there has been an absolute laxity on the part of the petitioner/defendant, ought not to have been denied inasmuch as the right to cross-examine is an indelible right of party before the Civil Court: Delhi High Court
February 15, 2023by Primelegal Team0

CM (M) 221/2023 & CM APPL. 6609/2023 (Stay) STANDARD CHARTERED BANK vs SUPREME INFRATECH PVT LTD The petitioner challenged the order of 25.07.2

Claim of juvenility can be raised at any stage, even after the final disposal of the case: Punjab High Court.
Claim of juvenility can be raised at any stage, even after the final disposal of the case: Punjab High Court.
February 15, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Punjab High Court passed an order dated 16th January, 2023, ABC v/s State of Haryana (CRM-M-44156-2016 (O&M), wherein the court held that t