Other family members cannot constitute as an alternative for parents of a minor child: Punjab High Court.
In an order passed on 16th December, 2022, Rahul v/s Shalini (CR-2579-2022 (O&M), the Punjab High Court held that the petitioner-husbands’ pa
The contract expired, and Copper Chimney was no longer permitted to operate from its Kala Ghoda outlet: Bombay High Court.
The Bombay High Court recently ruled that Kalaghoda’s Copper Chimney restaurant’s use of force majeure would not result in an extension
Google warning on downloading third-party apps is industry practice, not infringement or disparagement: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High court passed a judgement on 14th February, 2023. This was seen in the case of Winzo Games Private Limited v Google LLC & Ors 202
Delhi High Court seeks Central government response on plea claiming absence of penal code in Jammu and Kashmir : Delhi HC
The Delhi High court passed a judgement on 17th February, 2023. This was seen in the case of Anubhav Gupta v Union of India & Anr. 2023/DHC he
No person can be expected to live with constant abuse: Delhi High Court upholds divorce on ground of cruelty by wife
The Delhi High court passed a judgement on 9th February, 2023. This was seen in the case of Deepti Bhardwaj v Rajeev Bhardwaj2023/DHC/001004and he
Delhi High Court seeks Central and Delhi governments’ response on plea for proper maintenance of public toilets
The Delhi High court passed a judgement on 17th February, 2023. This was seen in the case of Jan Seva Welfare Society (Reg.) v. Union o f I
The petitioner is already serving as Block Development Officer. We accordingly direct that a formal clearance permitting the petitioner to work as Block Development Officer in the UP Government shall be issued by the competent authority within a period of four weeks from today: Delhi High Court
W.P. (C) 16430/2022 VINAYAK SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS The petitioner in the current case sought to direct the Respondents to grant of NOC/
Whether the statement made by the father of the deceased with respect to the demand of Rs. 25,00,000/- by the applicant and his mother or whether Rs. 10,00,000/- cash was paid to the applicant is a matter of trial, which the prosecution need to prove by leading evidence in support thereof: Delhi High Court
BAIL APPLN. 3475/2022 SURAJ MALIK v. THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI The current application was under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedur
Wife entitled to maintenance money after receiving alimony: Punjab High Court.
Wife entitled to maintenance money after receiving alimony: Punjab High Court. The Punjab High Court in Sunil Sachdeva v/s Rashmi and another (CRM-
Ocular witness to be assigned precedence over the medical account: Punjab High Court.
The Punjab High Court in Subhash @ Makkar and others v/s State of Haryana and Dharampal v/s state of Haryana and others (CRA-D-474-DB-2013 and CRA-
