Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Petitioner cannot deflect from responsibility towards wife, kids: Punjab High Court.
Petitioner cannot deflect from responsibility towards wife, kids: Punjab High Court.
March 9, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Punjab High Court on 2nd March, 2023, in Sh. Sandeep Malik v/s Renu and others (CRR(F)-314 of 2023(O&M), held that the petitioner was respo

CONTINUE READING
Waiver of Loan Cannot Be Assessed as Business Income: The Supreme Court
March 9, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. (2018) 404 ITR 1/165 DTR 337/302 CTR 213/255 Taxman 305 (SC) held that as per S.

CONTINUE READING
AS A CREATURE OF THE STATUTE, THE CORPORATION CANNOT PREVENT AN ESTABLISHMENT FROM SEEKING AN EXEMPTION FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE ACT, 1948 WHEN THE GRANT OF SUCH EXEMPTION IN AN INTEGRAL FEATURE OF THE STATUTORY SCHEME: KERALA HIGH COURT
AS A CREATURE OF THE STATUTE, THE CORPORATION CANNOT PREVENT AN ESTABLISHMENT FROM SEEKING AN EXEMPTION FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE ACT, 1948 WHEN THE GRANT OF SUCH EXEMPTION IN AN INTEGRAL FEATURE OF THE STATUTORY SCHEME: KERALA HIGH COURT
March 9, 2023by Primelegal Team

The High Court of Kerala passed a judgement on  16th January 2023, which stated that as a creature of the statute, the corporation cannot prevent

CONTINUE READING
SECTION 17(2) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 ONLY ENABLES AN ARBITRATOR TO PASS AN INTERIM ORDER. THERE IS NO POWER VESTED WITH THE ARBITRATOR TO ACT AS A CIVIL COURT AND ENFORCE THE ORDER.: KERALA HIGH COURT
SECTION 17(2) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 ONLY ENABLES AN ARBITRATOR TO PASS AN INTERIM ORDER. THERE IS NO POWER VESTED WITH THE ARBITRATOR TO ACT AS A CIVIL COURT AND ENFORCE THE ORDER.: KERALA HIGH COURT
March 9, 2023by Primelegal Team

The High Court of Kerala passed a judgement on 17TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023                                       which stated that

CONTINUE READING
The enjoyment of the ownership rights is subjective to the requirements of the development plan: Andhra Pradesh High Court
The enjoyment of the ownership rights is subjective to the requirements of the development plan: Andhra Pradesh High Court
March 8, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Andhra Pradesh High Court issued an order on 20th January, 1987 in which it held that any construction on the property allotted for recreation

CONTINUE READING
Notional breaks cannot be used unfairly against employees: Punjab High Court.
Notional breaks cannot be used unfairly against employees: Punjab High Court.
March 8, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Punjab High Court in Bhajan Singh v/s PRTC (CWP-13281-2017), delivered on 31st January, 2023, held that notional breaks cannot be used unfairly

CONTINUE READING
DLSA to pay compensation to rape victim under repealed 2013 scheme: Punjab High Court.
DLSA to pay compensation to rape victim under repealed 2013 scheme: Punjab High Court.
March 8, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Punjab High Court, on 2nd February, 2023, in ABC v/s State of Haryana and others (CWP-16867-2022 (O&M), directed compensation to the victim

CONTINUE READING
Karnataka High Court Holds That POCSO Act Should Not Be An Excuse To Not Grant The Accused An Opportunity Of Cross Examination.
Karnataka High Court Holds That POCSO Act Should Not Be An Excuse To Not Grant The Accused An Opportunity Of Cross Examination.
March 8, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Karnataka High Court has passed a judgment on 13th February, 2023 set aside an order passed by the Special Court which rejected the application

CONTINUE READING
Under Domestic Violence Act Court Can Order Husband To Pay Wife Monetary Expenses In Lieu Of Shared House: Karnataka High Court
Under Domestic Violence Act Court Can Order Husband To Pay Wife Monetary Expenses In Lieu Of Shared House: Karnataka High Court
March 8, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Karnataka High Court has passed a judgment on 7th February, 2023 modified an order passed by the Trial court which directed a woman be paid Rs.

CONTINUE READING
Waman Rao and others vs. UOI: Court held that in the 1981 case of Waman Rao v. Union of India, the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of Articles 31A and 31B of the Indian Constitution in light of the Kesavananda Bharati judgment’s introduction of the fundamental structure theory. Court: Supreme Court of India. (1981) 2 SCC 362, 1981 2 SCR 1.
Waman Rao and others vs. UOI: Court held that in the 1981 case of Waman Rao v. Union of India, the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of Articles 31A and 31B of the Indian Constitution in light of the Kesavananda Bharati judgment’s introduction of the fundamental structure theory. Court: Supreme Court of India. (1981) 2 SCC 362, 1981 2 SCR 1.
March 8, 2023by Primelegal Team

Facts of the Case: The Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Act, 1962 (the Act) which put a ceiling upon the agricultural lands was updated and the ceili

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.