Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Mere Write Off Is Sufficient for Claiming Deduction of Bad Debt: The Supreme Court
March 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Supreme Court in the case of T. R. F. Ltd. v. CIT (2010) 323 ITR 397/190 Taxman 391/35 DTR 156/(2011) 220 Taxation 88 (SC) held that as per S.

NO QUARRYING COULD HAVE BEEN UNDERTAKEN IN THE PROPERTY FOR THE BASIC REASON THAT THE AREA WHEREIN THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION IS SITUATED, IS A RED ZONE AREA IN THE ZONATION MAP: KERALA HIGH COURT
NO QUARRYING COULD HAVE BEEN UNDERTAKEN IN THE PROPERTY FOR THE BASIC REASON THAT THE AREA WHEREIN THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION IS SITUATED, IS A RED ZONE AREA IN THE ZONATION MAP: KERALA HIGH COURT
March 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The High Court of Kerala passed a judgement on  17 January, 2023which stated that no quarrying could have been undertaken in the property for the

IT IS FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO PAY THE STATUTORY INTEREST TO THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN AGITATING FOR THE AMOUNTS DUE TO THEM OPT AND THEN TO RECOVER IT FROM THE C-STED, IF SO ADVISED: KERALA HIGH COURT
IT IS FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO PAY THE STATUTORY INTEREST TO THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN AGITATING FOR THE AMOUNTS DUE TO THEM OPT AND THEN TO RECOVER IT FROM THE C-STED, IF SO ADVISED: KERALA HIGH COURT
March 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The High Court of Kerala passed a judgement on   19 January, 2023 which stated that it is for the government to pay the statutory interest to tho

Karnataka High Court Directs Police To Register Visually Challenged Person’s Complaint Under PwD Act Instead Of Consigning Him To Common Law Remedy.
Karnataka High Court Directs Police To Register Visually Challenged Person’s Complaint Under PwD Act Instead Of Consigning Him To Common Law Remedy.
March 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Karnataka High Court has passed a judgment on 16th February, 2023 held  that a disabled person raising a complaint under provisions of the Rig

“The Charger Which Is Sold Along With The Mobile Phone In One Set And Accordingly Taxable At 5%”: Karnataka High Court
“The Charger Which Is Sold Along With The Mobile Phone In One Set And Accordingly Taxable At 5%”: Karnataka High Court
March 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Karnataka High Court has passed a judgment on 10th February, 2023 held that the mobile phone finds its place in Schedule III and is taxable at

Capital or Revenue, Business Income, Construction Company, Netting of Receipts and Payments, Amounts Received by the Assessee Would Go to Reduction of Cost of Construction: The Supreme Court
March 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Bokaro Steel Ltd. (1999) 236 ITR 315/102 Taxman 94/151 CTR 276 (SC) held that as per S. 4 of Income Tax Act

Departmental action cannot be initiated post retirement of the employee: Punjab High Court.
Departmental action cannot be initiated post retirement of the employee: Punjab High Court.
March 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Punjab High Court, on 7th December, 2022, in Raj Pal v/s State of Haryana and others (CWP-5842-2022), held that departmental enquiry cannot be

Failure of compliance to remove hoarding and billboards met with contempt petition: Punjab High Court.
Failure of compliance to remove hoarding and billboards met with contempt petition: Punjab High Court.
March 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

A petition was filed at the Punjab High Court on 13th February, 2023, in Council of Engineers and anr v/s V.K. Janjua and anr. (COCP-2736-2022), re

This instance of discrimination against women is illustrated in the case of Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan. The Supreme Court decided the Vishaka guidelines in this case for the protection of women from sexual harassment at work since specific law was required in this area.
This instance of discrimination against women is illustrated in the case of Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan. The Supreme Court decided the Vishaka guidelines in this case for the protection of women from sexual harassment at work since specific law was required in this area.
March 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Facts of the Case: To provide a better comprehension, it is essential to present the case’s facts in depth at the start. Initially, the alleg

Shreya Singhal v. Union of India: A Case That Reinvigorated the Country’s Freedom of Speech and Expression. Supreme Court.
Shreya Singhal v. Union of India: A Case That Reinvigorated the Country’s Freedom of Speech and Expression. Supreme Court.
March 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Facts of the Case: According to Article 32 of the Indian Constitution, the petitioner filed a writ case in the public interest asking the Supreme C