Waiver of Loan Cannot Be Assessed as Business Income: The Supreme Court
The Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. (2018) 404 ITR 1/165 DTR 337/302 CTR 213/255 Taxman 305 (SC) held that as per S.
AS A CREATURE OF THE STATUTE, THE CORPORATION CANNOT PREVENT AN ESTABLISHMENT FROM SEEKING AN EXEMPTION FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE ACT, 1948 WHEN THE GRANT OF SUCH EXEMPTION IN AN INTEGRAL FEATURE OF THE STATUTORY SCHEME: KERALA HIGH COURT
The High Court of Kerala passed a judgement on 16th January 2023, which stated that as a creature of the statute, the corporation cannot prevent
SECTION 17(2) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 ONLY ENABLES AN ARBITRATOR TO PASS AN INTERIM ORDER. THERE IS NO POWER VESTED WITH THE ARBITRATOR TO ACT AS A CIVIL COURT AND ENFORCE THE ORDER.: KERALA HIGH COURT
The High Court of Kerala passed a judgement on 17TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 which stated that
The enjoyment of the ownership rights is subjective to the requirements of the development plan: Andhra Pradesh High Court
The Andhra Pradesh High Court issued an order on 20th January, 1987 in which it held that any construction on the property allotted for recreation
Notional breaks cannot be used unfairly against employees: Punjab High Court.
The Punjab High Court in Bhajan Singh v/s PRTC (CWP-13281-2017), delivered on 31st January, 2023, held that notional breaks cannot be used unfairly
DLSA to pay compensation to rape victim under repealed 2013 scheme: Punjab High Court.
The Punjab High Court, on 2nd February, 2023, in ABC v/s State of Haryana and others (CWP-16867-2022 (O&M), directed compensation to the victim
Karnataka High Court Holds That POCSO Act Should Not Be An Excuse To Not Grant The Accused An Opportunity Of Cross Examination.
The Karnataka High Court has passed a judgment on 13th February, 2023 set aside an order passed by the Special Court which rejected the application
Under Domestic Violence Act Court Can Order Husband To Pay Wife Monetary Expenses In Lieu Of Shared House: Karnataka High Court
The Karnataka High Court has passed a judgment on 7th February, 2023 modified an order passed by the Trial court which directed a woman be paid Rs.
Waman Rao and others vs. UOI: Court held that in the 1981 case of Waman Rao v. Union of India, the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of Articles 31A and 31B of the Indian Constitution in light of the Kesavananda Bharati judgment’s introduction of the fundamental structure theory. Court: Supreme Court of India. (1981) 2 SCC 362, 1981 2 SCR 1.
Facts of the Case: The Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Act, 1962 (the Act) which put a ceiling upon the agricultural lands was updated and the ceili
The Criminal Procedure Code’s Section 125(1) deals with the topic of “Who Can Claim Maintenance?” Mohd. Ahmed Khan VS Shah Bano Begum & Ors. Supreme Court of India, Bench: DY CHANDRACHUD – CJI. 1985 AIR 945, 1985 SCR (3) 844.
Facts of the Case: Three boys and two daughters were born to Mohd Ahmed Khan (the appealing party), a lawyer by profession, and Shah Bano Begum (th
