Understanding Vicarious Liability in Criminal Proceedings: A Case Analysis
Mr. Kaningat Rajan vs M/S. Ample Technologies Private 18 May, 2023 Bench: Hon’ble K.Natarajan Introduction: In a recent case filed under
Karnataka High Court ruling emphasizes the need for direct evidence in Corruption Allegations
Mr Yashwanth vs State Of Karnataka 18 May, 2023 Bench: Hon’ble K.Natarajan Facts The complainant, a retired Under Secretary named Shivashan
ONCE IN THE COMPREHENSIVE TITLE SUIT, THE DECREE IS PASSED AGAINST THE APPELLANTS, THEREAFTER, ANY FURTHER CLAIM WILL BE BARRED BY RES-JUDICATA: MADRAS HIGH COURT
The High Court of Madras passed a judgment on 27 April 2023 stating that Once in the comprehensive title suit, the decree is passed against the app
IF THE WITNESSES ARE REPEATEDLY EXAMINED, THERE BOUND TO OCCUR SOME INCONSISTENCIES AND CONTRADICTIONS IN THE EVIDENCE DUE TO FADING AND FAILING MEMORY: MADRAS HIGH COURT
The High Court of Madras passed a judgment on 27 April 2023 stating that if the witnesses are repeatedly examined, there bound to occur some inco
PETITIONERS CANNOT SEEK SHELTER BY STATING THAT WHAT IS INVOLVED IN THIS CASE IS AN ACT OF ANTI-DATING AND NOT AN OFFENCE OF FORGERY OR CREATION OF A FALSE DOCUMENT.: MADRAS HIGH COURT
The High Court of Madras passed a judgment on 27 April 2023 stating that petitioners cannot seek shelter by stating that what is involved in this c
UNDER SECTION 212 OF THE COMPANIES ACT,2013 IT IS ALWAYS OPEN TO APPEAR BEFORE THE INVESTIGATION OFFICER IN COMPLIANCE OF THE SUMMONS ISSUED TO THEM WITHOUT PREJUDICE : MADRAS HIGH COURT
The High Court of Madras passed a judgment on 27 April 2023 stating that under Section 212 of the Companies Act,2013 it is always open to appear be
Bail Granted to Accused No.5 in a Chamarajanagar Murder Case: A Closer Look at the Decision
Mahesh vs State Of Karnataka 18 May, 2023 Bench: Hon’ble Rajendra Badamikar Introduction: In a recent development, the Court of Addition
“Discharge Application under Section 227 and 239 of Cr.P.C in the Karnataka High Court”
State Of Karnataka vs B S Shivaprakash 18 May, 2023 Bench:Hon’ble Rajendra Badamikar Introduction: The Indian legal system provides provisi
THE RBI HAS TAKEN ACTION AGAINST PAYTM UNDER SEC.35-A OF THE BANKING REGULATION ACT 1949 : MADRAS HIGH COURT
The High Court of Madras passed a judgment on 28 April 2023 stating that The RBI has taken action against PayTM under Sec.35-A of the Banking Reg
UNDER SECTION 24(2) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT,2013 THERE ARE TWO REQUIREMENTS OF TAKING OVER POSSESSION AND PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION: MADRAS HIGH COURT
The High Court of Madras passed a judgment on 28 April 2023 stating that under Section 24(2) of the Land Acquisition Act,2013 there are two requi
