TITLE: ANALYSIS OF A MURDER CASE: EVALUATING DYING DECLARATIONS AND EVIDENTIARY VALUE-BOMBAY HIGH COURT
INTRODUCTION: The High Court of Bombay-Nagpur Bench passed a judgement on 14 June 2023. In the case of SHAHRUKH SALIM PATHAN AND OTHERS Vs THE ST
AN ANALYSIS OF A JUDGMENT: ENSURING FAIRNESS IN THE SELECTION PROCESS FOR LAW CLERKS-BOMBAY HIGH COURT
INTRODUCTION The High Court of Bombay-Nagpur Bench passed a judgement on 14 June 2023. In the case of MADHAV RAJESH VED Vs THE REGISTRAR GENERAL
If an employer has effected a reasonable opportunity of being heard to his employee, then the order of his dismissal cannot be contested:Gujarat High Court allows petition filed by the Jamnagar Municipal Corporation.
Jamnagar Municipal Corporation vs Bharat Chandulal Vaghela on 3 May, 2023 Bench: Honourable Justice Mauna M. Bhatt R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
In order to convict a person under section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, the electric company must afford a reasonable opportunity to the party of being heard: Gujarat High Court
Anilaba Mangalsinh Rana vs The Paschim Gujarat Vij Company … on 3 May, 2023 Bench: Honourable Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati R/SPECIAL CIVIL AP
WRIT PETITON CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF DETENTION PASSED BY COLLECTOR IN ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati Pedda Matangi Mounika vs The State of AP BENCH – THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.V.S.S. SOMAYAJULU
CIVIL REVISION PETITION FILED IN ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT AGAINST THE ORDER OF PRINCIPLAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati KHANDAVILLI RUDRAVENI vs KHANDAVILLI ANNAVARAM & ANOTHER BENCH – HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.
Karnataka High Court Upholds: Residing Together No Ground to Reject Divorce by Mutual Consent”
Karnataka High Court DIVYA GANESH NALLUR V. GANESH NALLUR SHIVU WRIT PETITION NO. 24429 OF 2022 (GM-FC) Bench- HON’BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S D
Karnataka High Court Rules: Registrar Cannot Direct Registration of Sale Deed After Civil Court Rejects Suit for Specific Performance
Karnataka High Court A Vasudevachar & Others v. The District Registrar & Others WRIT PETITION NO.48476 OF 2013 Bench- Hon’ble Justice
The Delhi High Court has ruled that the refund of the combined tax paid on discounted supply is not subject to Rule 89(4) of the CGST Rules.
Case Title: Ohmi Industries Asia Private Limited Versus Assistant Commissioner Case No.: W.P.(C) 6856/2022 Date: 29.03.2023 CORAM: HON’BLE
The Delhi High Court overturns the SCN for lack of justification and reinstates the taxpayer’s GST status.
Case Title: Rishiraj Aluminium Private Limited Versus Goods and Service Tax Officer Case No.: W.P.(C) 4125/2023 Date: 17.04.2023 CORAM: HON’B
