Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The Gujarat High Court Rejected Teesta Setalvad’s plea and ordered her to surrender IMMEDIATELY in police custody.
The Gujarat High Court Rejected Teesta Setalvad’s plea and ordered her to surrender IMMEDIATELY in police custody.
July 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Teesta Atul Setalvad vs State Of Gujarat (R/CR.MA/14435/2022) Decided on: 1st July 2023 CORAM: HON’BLE Justice Nirzar Desai Introduction The

CONTINUE READING
To be enforceable, a Lok Adalat Award must include all of the following features, says the High Court of Kerala
To be enforceable, a Lok Adalat Award must include all of the following features, says the High Court of Kerala
July 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title : Case Title: Vijaya K Vs. Muraleedharan K G Bench : HON’BLE MR. A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE, MRS. SOPHY THOMAS JUDGE O.P.NO.539/2007 Da

CONTINUE READING
The Gujarat High Court finds that reinstatement is not feasible after such an extended period, but the awarded compensation needs improvement. Therefore, the court enhances the compensation amount to Rs.1,50,000/- to ensure justice.
The Gujarat High Court finds that reinstatement is not feasible after such an extended period, but the awarded compensation needs improvement. Therefore, the court enhances the compensation amount to Rs.1,50,000/- to ensure justice.
July 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case- Gordhanbhai Dhamabhai Patel vs Deputy Range Forest Officer Decided on: 27th  June 2023 CORAM: HON’BLE Justice Rajendra M. Sareen Intro

CONTINUE READING
Circumstantial evidence may not lead to an accurate decision in the execution of justice says Punjab High Court
Circumstantial evidence may not lead to an accurate decision in the execution of justice says Punjab High Court
July 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE – Kaur v State of Punjab Decided On- :16.06.2023 CRR-684-2007 (O&M) CORAM:  HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY INTRODUCTION –

CONTINUE READING
The Rajasthan High Court reiterates that DNA paternity tests cannot be performed on a regular basis and must only be done under special circumstances.
July 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE: X versus Y Decided on 26/05/2023 2023/RJJD/016587 Coram: HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI Facts of the case: The parties got

CONTINUE READING
The POCSO case against man dismissed by Rajasthan High Court because victim claims she was not abducted forcibly
The POCSO case against man dismissed by Rajasthan High Court because victim claims she was not abducted forcibly
July 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE: Ankit Jatav v. State Of Rajasthan & Anr. Decided on: 31/05/2023 CRLMP-3075/2023 Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR Facts of

CONTINUE READING
The Delhi High Court set aside the order of the Railway Claims Tribunal and granted compensation to the appellants.
July 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Sita Devi & Ors. vs UOI Decided: 22.03.2023 Pronounced: 02.06.2023 FAO 46/2022 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI Introductio

CONTINUE READING
Allahabad High Court declares Sections 41 and 41A to be facets of Article 21 of the Constitution, police have a duty to record the reason for arrest in writing.
Allahabad High Court declares Sections 41 and 41A to be facets of Article 21 of the Constitution, police have a duty to record the reason for arrest in writing.
July 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Rajkumari vs. State Of U.P. And 3 Others Decided on: 28th June, 2023 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. – 7496 of 2023 CORAM: HON’BLE

CONTINUE READING
Allahabad High Court orders for immediate release of a man sent to jail for a crime he already served sentence for, 14 years ago.
Allahabad High Court orders for immediate release of a man sent to jail for a crime he already served sentence for, 14 years ago.
July 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Raj Narain @ Ram vs. State of U.P Decided on: 23rd June, 2023 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. – 1817 of 2003 CORAM: HON’BLE RAJAN ROY J. Introdu

CONTINUE READING
The Gujarat High Court Division Bench found that a written complaint must be filed within 45 days, and in the absence of such a complaint, the seized property should be released without insisting on a bank guarantee.
The Gujarat High Court Division Bench found that a written complaint must be filed within 45 days, and in the absence of such a complaint, the seized property should be released without insisting on a bank guarantee.
July 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title MANSUKH ALIAS RAVJI GORASIYA V. THE STATE OF GUJARAT (C/LPA/717/2020) CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH and H

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.