Review application is not valid for an order passed by a Quasi Judicial Body : Bombay HC
TITLE : Sitara Anil Sharma V The Apex Grievance Redressal Committee CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Madhav J Jamdar DATE : 19th December, 2023 CITA
Proclamation against the accused was set aside when the time specified was less than 30 days to appear in a specific for an absconded accused : Bombay HC
TITLE : Deepak Sitaram Modhe v State of Maharashtra CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Sarang V Kotwal DATE : 22nd December, 2023 CITATION : Criminal
Smt. Bhawna Vs. Hemsingh @ Tinchu
Cruelty, if proven, is an actual cause of action for divorce: the court ruled that there is no legal requirement on the court to compel the restora
Mufti Qazi Jahangir Alam Qasmi vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others
Concept of Parity: the court, emphasizing this concept, found that the appellant was entitled to be extended on bail, particularly because co-accus
Late Smt. Shanta Pagaria W/O Late … vs. Jaipur Development Authority
Legal acquisition of the property…….. The court criticized the arbitrary actions of the Jaipur Development Authority (JDA), provided relief by
Demonstration of wilful disobedience of a decision of the Court with a calculated action and evil motive on the part of the contemnor directly constitutes case of Contempt of Court. – Delhi HC
Title: VIREN SINGH versus MADHUP VYASF & ORS. + CONT.CAS(C) 474/2018 Decided on- 13 December 2023 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHA
Upholding doctrine of Lis Pendens hon’ble Delhi High Court clarified that the mere filing of an appeal doesn’t automatically stay proceedings unless an interim order is passed.
Title: NARENDRA KUMAR versus RAJESH CHAUDHARY & ANR + RFA 282/2023, + RFA 283/2023 & CM APPL. 62717/2023, + RFA 284/2023 Decided on- 22nd D
Manohari vs. State
Revisional jurisdiction is not meant for re-evaluating evidence….. The court concluded that the impugned orders were not grossly erroneous, and t
“The issues of patient care service are dependent upon the competence of the concerned doctor or the ECG technician” : State of West Bengal Tit
The Madras High Court has upheld the State Government’s right to choose Public Prosecutors and Additional Public Prosecutors.
Case Title: R Suresh Kumar v The Principal Secretary to Government Case No: W.P.(MD)No.29723 of 2023 Decided on: 19th December, 2023 CORAM: THE HON
