Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Delhi High Court directed KVS to grant admission to petitioner’s ward, who was denied the same on the grounds that EWS certificate was not issued by govt of Delhi but UP.
Delhi High Court directed KVS to grant admission to petitioner’s ward, who was denied the same on the grounds that EWS certificate was not issued by govt of Delhi but UP.
January 4, 2024by Primelegal Team

Case Title: Hare Krishna Pathak vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr. Case No: W.P.(C) 3041/2022 & CM APPL. 8955/2023 Decided on: 22nd Dec

CONTINUE READING
The Previous Order Which Is Correct In Law Can Not Be Modified By The Interim Application : Bombay HC
The Previous Order Which Is Correct In Law Can Not Be Modified By The Interim Application : Bombay HC
January 4, 2024by Primelegal Team

TITLE : Mangaka Sarosh Bana v Renuka alias Rekha Satish Narwankar   CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Milind N Jadhav DATE :  3rd January 2024 CITATION :

CONTINUE READING
Appellate Court Upholds Determination of Coparcener Rights in Ancestral Property Dispute: Bombay HC
Appellate Court Upholds Determination of Coparcener Rights in Ancestral Property Dispute: Bombay HC
January 4, 2024by Primelegal Team

Title: Sau. Ushabai Vs Smt. Mainabai and ORS. Citation: SECOND APPEAL NO. 326/2015 Coram: Justice SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR Date: 22/12/23 Facts The case

CONTINUE READING
“Abduction Alone Not Enough, Demands Ransom and Threats to Life Must Be proven for Sec 364A IPC”: SUPREME COURT
“Abduction Alone Not Enough, Demands Ransom and Threats to Life Must Be proven for Sec 364A IPC”: SUPREME COURT
January 4, 2024by Primelegal Team

Case Title: Neeraj Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh Case No: Criminal Appeal NO. 1420 OF 2019 Decided on:  3 January, 2024 CORAM: Justice Sudhanshu

CONTINUE READING
The Supreme Court Affirms Perumal Raja’s Conviction, Unraveling Legal Nuances and Co-Accused Variances”
The Supreme Court Affirms Perumal Raja’s Conviction, Unraveling Legal Nuances and Co-Accused Variances”
January 4, 2024by Primelegal Team

Case Title: Perumal Raja @ Perumal vs State Rep. by the Inspector of Police   Case No: Crl. Appeal @ SLP (Crl.) No. 863 of 2019 Decided on:  3 Ja

CONTINUE READING
Delhi High Court ordered the respondents to shut down any coaching centers that were operating in violation of the MPD, 2021’s requirements
Delhi High Court ordered the respondents to shut down any coaching centers that were operating in violation of the MPD, 2021’s requirements
January 4, 2024by Primelegal Team

Case Title: Sanjay Singhal vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors. Case No: W.P.(C) 8534/2023 Decided on: 14.12.2023 Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice

CONTINUE READING
The Kerala High Court directs the Travancore Devaswom Board to maximize vehicle parking, deploy volunteers and provide drinking water to pilgrims.
The Kerala High Court directs the Travancore Devaswom Board to maximize vehicle parking, deploy volunteers and provide drinking water to pilgrims.
January 4, 2024by Primelegal Team

Case Title: Suo Motu v. State of Kerala & Ors. Case No: SSCR No. 41 of 2023 Decided on: 3rd January, 2024 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL

CONTINUE READING
The Madras High Court suggested direct bank transfers for flood assistance and pongal gifts to prevent potential fund misappropriation by authorities.
January 4, 2024by Primelegal Team

Case Title: The Chennimalai Siragiri Murugan Primary Handloom Weaver’s Cooperative Society Ltd v Income Tax Officer Case No: W.P.Nos.3919 of

CONTINUE READING
The Madras High Court found no scope for extra age relaxation in the General Rules, as SC/ST candidates were already granted a five-year age relaxation in the Special Rules per the recruitment notification.
January 4, 2024by Primelegal Team

Case Title: State of Tamil Nadu v K Parvathy Case No: WA (MD) No. 416 of 2023 (batch cases) Decided on: 29th November, 2023 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR

CONTINUE READING
Calcutta High Court held that when documentary evidence is available the oral testimony of witness is not sufficient to rebut its probative value.
Calcutta High Court held that when documentary evidence is available the oral testimony of witness is not sufficient to rebut its probative value.
January 4, 2024by Primelegal Team

Case Title: Minati Bhadra & Ors. Vs Dilip Kr. Bhadra & Ors. Case No: S.A. 406 of 2016 Decided on: 19th October, 2023 CORAM: Hon’ble Justi

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.