Writ actions cannot be invoked after undue delay and latches. Accordingly, this Court is of the view that the petitioner cannot challenge his APAR
Writ actions cannot be invoked after undue delay and latches. Accordingly, this Court is of the view that the petitioner cannot challenge his APAR
Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 defining a period of 3 years will be computed after considering Section 18 or 19 of the Limitation Act, 196
Quashing the FIR by going beyond the averments, to consider the merits of the case even before the investigating agency has embarked upon the legal
For an FIR to be quashed under Section 482 of the CrPC, it is necessary to show that the FIR was lodged with mala fides or malice. For this, the co
When the law is clear from the beginning, the petitioner cannot be allowed to stake claim of being appointed as a District Judge from the stream of
A trial judge, having the power to award a death sentence, must have correct knowledge of legal principles and zeal while exercising the most onero
While allowing a writ petition, the HC asserted that statutory authorities are required to function responsibly since the focus is on good governan
If the probationer is able to resume after the two-year duration has expired, automatic certification cannot be asserted as a matter of right becau
The principal question which requires consideration is whether from the evidence on record, can it be inferred that the spouse has committed an act
Preventive detention is designed to keep society secure, even if they involve some restraint and hardship upon some individuals, do not partake in