In the present case, the Petitioner apprehends arrest under section 212/216A/120B/353/34 of the Indian Penal Code. A single-judge bench comprisin
In the present case, the Petitioner apprehends arrest under section 212/216A/120B/353/34 of the Indian Penal Code. A single-judge bench comprisin
In a criminal trial, the prosecution needs to establish each and every circumstance with certainty and even if they fail to do so, the burden of pr
In cases where a workman is suspended from service illegally, he is entitled to gain 100% of the back wages he was owed for the time period he was
The justification given by a person to delay the payment for an auction for an indefinite period of time in lieu of the Covid-19 pandemic is no exc
Damages are entirely insufficient as a panacea for the holder of a valid patent which is infringed by another. Intellectual property has its own sa
The incriminating circumstances which point to the guilt of the accused had been put to him, yet he chose not to give any explanation under Section
When there is direct, credible witness testimony as to the commission of an offence, the motive element of the equation is nullified. As a result,
An order of detention is necessary in situations which cause panic in the minds of people which disturbs the public peace and tranquility. The tw
The single judge bench comprising of Hon’ble Justice N. S. Dhanik ruled, “where there is a genuine compromise and there is hardly any likeliho
“As we have already indicated, in the absence of any provision in the service rules for reinstatement, if an employee is honourably acquitted by