blog - Page 835 of 984 - Prime Legal Law Firm

Statements u/s 164 CrPC can be used both for contradiction and corroboration, and hence cannot be taken as a substantial evidence: Odisha High Court

A statement made under Section 164 CrPC is solely not a substantial evidence as such statement can be used for both contradiction and corroboration

Jurisdiction of the High Courts can be invoked if there is no alternative remedy for the petitioner – High Court of Sikkim

The jurisdiction of High Courts under article 226 is applicable only when the other available solutions have been exhausted or are unavailable. Suc

Bail application to be rejected if the applicant is likely to get convicted for an offence – Uttarakhand High Court.

Bail application filed under section 439 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 may be rejected if the nature of the offence is serious, the injur

The power of a court to grant anticipatory bail cannot be limited solely on grounds of how serious the alleged offence is: Supreme Court of India

Anticipatory bail is a provision under Section 438(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, which allows a person to request bail when he has good reason

Powers under Section 319 of the CPC meant to be used by court only in exceptional cases: Supreme Court of India

The power granted to the court under Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code allows for a person other than the accused to be tried alongside th

Any transfer of property cannot be made which is not covered by any statute or law.- Allahabad High court.

The Single Judge bench comprising Justice Sri Rajnish Kumar, decreed “ This court is of the considered view that the transfer of an agricultural

Pre-arrest bail is denied to the accused ,even if there is FIR of the same incident as a defence : Patna High court

The pre-arrest bail granted in anticipation of arrest has to function like any other order granting bail till an order of conviction or till

Confiscated items to be released if the proceedings are not initiated within 90 days. – Patna High Court.

On a matter dealing with the Bihar Prohibition and excise act, 2016, the Hon’ble Chief Justice and Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. Kumar decreed that, �

The husband cannot use deception to deny her the right to a dignified life: Tripura High Court

The husband is unable to take subterfuges to rob her of a dignified life. As the solemn undertaking was required in marriage, and as a result, it i

It is reasonable to infer that the marital connection is beyond repair when there has been a long time of continuous separation: Tripura High Court

If there is a prolonged time of continual separation, the matrimonial relationship is fairly irreparable. Marriage is a lie but backed by a civil r

Blogs And Articles