Foul play in e-tender resulting is misappropriation of balance payment: Supreme Court of India
A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is a petition that can be filed by any member of the public for any matter of public interest, for redress of pu
Severely harsh conditions cannot be imposed on the release of seized vehicle: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh
It is of no use to keep such seized vehicles at the police stations for a long period. It is for the Magistrate to pass appropriate orders immediat
The court must refrain from making prima facie decisions in interlocutory phase when all the facts of the case are incomplete; High Court of J&K
The F.I.R containing allegation which set the police in motion cannot quashed at the threshold stage. The FIR was filed against the petitioner unde
No legally enforceable right accrues in favour of a successful candidate in a selection not held in accordance with law: High Court of Calcutta
The petitioner cannot reap the benefit of a selection process that was not held according to the guidelines published in the Indian Oil Corporation
“Respondent addressed the query by providing the information regarding the agenda and minutes of the Board Meeting…”: SEBI, Part 3.
The appellant, vide query number 5, sought the following information- “Share the criteria under which grandfathering provision was provided to ex
The court cannot interdict if proceedings are already initiated against the petitioner by a competent authority: Delhi High Court
The court cannot take up matters when a previously filed suit is still pending and it concerns the same subject matter of jurisdiction. This was he
The Legality of Proposed Arrest and Law Proceedings Turmoiled by Section 438 of Cr.P.C. : High Court of Tripura
Section 438 of Cr.P.C. deals with the Anticipatory Bail. This provision allows a person to seek bail in anticipation of an arrest on accusation on
Both the actual and potential harm caused by the wrong doing must be considered while blacklisting the offender: High Court of Delhi
When blacklisting an offender, it is vital that the authority considers both the actual and potential harm which could have arisen and according gi
The petitioners were released on bail, as the allegations were not corroborated by the material brought before the police: High court of Patna
The petitioner apprehended arrest under Section 147 IPC, “Punishment for rioting”, section 148, “Rioting, armed with a deadly weapon”, sect
“Respondent addressed the query by providing the information regarding the agenda and minutes of the Board Meeting…”: SEBI, Part 2.
In this context, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, in the matter of Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India Vs. Subhash Chandra Agarw
