The National Green Tribunal’s adjudicatory function cannot be delegated to expert committees: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court stated that the National Green Tribunal’s adjudicatory duty cannot be delegated to committees. The bench of Justices DY Cha
Unless it expresses a clear or manifest intention to the contrary, the rule of law cannot be construed as retrospective: Supreme Court
A rule or statute cannot be read as retrospective unless it shows a clear or manifest purpose to do so, the Supreme Court stated in the matter of A
‘Any party ’ can obtain interim relief from the court at three stages , According to the Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act , 1996.: New Delhi High Court .
The matter was concerned about the repayment of the outstanding loan amount from the other party, this was held in the judgement passed by a single
Non-examination of any independent witness results in impairing the credibility of the prosecution side: Delhi High Court
Non-examination of any independent witness culminated in hampering the credibility on the behalf of prosecution side. In a criminal suit filed unde
The property owner’s husband is not a stranger; he has the standing to file a criminal complaint against trespassers: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh
Anyone who is aware of the commission of any cognizable act can file an FIR, according to the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court. The Court al
No grounds found for interference in the matter of an arbitral award: Delhi High Court
In a separate suit filed in the Delhi High Court, under the purview of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, the judges opined that in the matters
The Court declined pre-arrest bail to the petitioner as he remarried without taking steps to restore his matrimonial relationship: High court of Patna
The petitioner was arrested under section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, “Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty”
The petitioners were released on bail after being arrested under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 of the IPC and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959.: High court of Patna
The petitioner was taken into custody under Sections 147, “ Punishment for rioting”, section 148, “Rioting, armed with a deadly weapon”, se
Accident claim -vehicle registered and insured in India – Accident in Nepal-Insurance Company liable to pay compensation – No extra premium can be charged for third party insurance even for extra territorial coverage: Punjab and Haryana High Court
It appeared that the competence of ‘India Motor Tariff’ to issue such instruction to limit the liability of the Insurance Company in te
Merely because complaint u/s138 NIA is filed–is no ground to quash the separate FIR u/s420/406 IPC. Offences u/s138 NIA and u/s 420/406 IPC not mutually exclusive. Both can go on side-be-side. No double jeopardy: Punjab and Haryana High Court
It appeared that Article 20 of the Constitution of India prohibits the conviction of a person twice for the ‘same offence’ and not for
