Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Delhi High Court Facilitates Arbitration over Unpaid Invoices

Case Title: DELHIVERY LIMITED Vs. FAR LEFT RETAIL PRIVATE LIMITED Case No.: ARB.P. 481/2024 Order on: MAY 17, 2024 Coram: NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J. F

The ruling emphasizes public colleges’ accountability to uphold the recommendations of the pay commissions and protect the employees’ financial well-being.

Case Title: Mrs. Prachi P. Kulkarni Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. Case No: WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 3980 OF 2022 Decided on: 9th May , 2024 Quo

DELHI HIGH COURT WAIVES FINE AFTER STUDENT’S APOLOGY AND FINANCIAL PLEA

Case Title: WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS Case No.: W.P.(CRL) 1203/2024 Order on: MAY 20, 2024 Coram: MANMEET PRITAM SINGH A

Delhi HC declines settlement agreement stating lack of intent to avoid Arbitration; Sends dispute to Arbitration.

CASE TITLE – M/S DHAWAN BOX SHEET CONTAINERS PVT. LTD v. M/S SHREYANSH HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD. CASE NUMBER – ARB.P. 1196/2023 DATED ON – 20.05.2

Delhi HC: Bounced cheques still count as acknowledging the debt, extending the time limit; Revision Petition dismissed.

CASE TITLE – M/S VOIR INDIA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD. v. M/S POLYBLENDS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. CASE NUMBER – C.R.P. 69/2022 & CM APPL. 22206/2022 DA

The ruling emphasizes public colleges’ accountability to uphold the recommendations of the pay commissions and protect the employees’ financial well-being.

Case Title: Mrs. Prachi P. Kulkarni Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. Case No: WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 3980 OF 2022 Decided on: 9th May , 2024 Quo

Four people are granted bail by the Allahabad High Court after they are charged with creating false Halal certifications and hurting religious feelings.

Case Title: Muhammed Tahir Zakir Chauhan and others versus State Of U.P. Trhu. Its Prin. Secy. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. Case No: CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPL

Jurisdictional Limits of Magistrates in Restoring Dismissed Complaints: Vakamulla Chandrashekhar & Ors. V. ROC”

Case Title: VAKAMULLA CHANDRASHEKHAR & ORS. Versus REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES -THROGH ITS DEPUTY REGISTRAR NCT OF DELHI AND HARYANA Case No: CRL.M.

The court stressed that judicial interference in expert-driven judgments is limited unless the criteria are perverse or unreasonable

Case Title: MANINI KAUSHIK Versus THE NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF INDIA & ORS. Case No: W.P.(C) 5438/2024 & CM APPL. 22456/2024 Decided o

Delhi High Court rulings: the grant of recovery rights as against the registered owner of the offending vehicle, cannot be sustained in law.

CASE TITTLE: SANDEEP YADAV. versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. CASE NO: MAC.APP. 39/2022& CM APPL. 7486/2022 ORDER ON: 20 May 2024 QUORUM: . J