Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The report is completely silent about the status of the seal put by W&M Department, therefore, DRP has rightly found that it is a case of ‘Major Irregularity’ and punishment should be awarded treating alleged irregularity as ‘Major Irregularity’: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The report is completely silent about the status of the seal put by W&M Department, therefore, DRP has rightly found that it is a case of ‘Major Irregularity’ and punishment should be awarded treating alleged irregularity as ‘Major Irregularity’: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The writ petition is disposed of by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of M/S GAGAN AUTOMOBILES V. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. thro

Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act provides that where any borrower, who is under a liability to a secured creditor under a security agreement, makes any default in repayment of secured debt or any instalment thereof, the secured creditor shall be entitled to exercise all or any of the rights under sub-section (4) of Section 13: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act provides that where any borrower, who is under a liability to a secured creditor under a security agreement, makes any default in repayment of secured debt or any instalment thereof, the secured creditor shall be entitled to exercise all or any of the rights under sub-section (4) of Section 13: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The writ petition is dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of BANK OF BARODA DEWAS BRANCH V. RAJENDRA SONI through HON

In the present case, even if the petitioner was found absent from duty for which she has submitted an explanation with necessary documents, then enquiry ought to have been conducted. If after enquiry the charges are found proved, then only the punishment order ought to have been passed: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
In the present case, even if the petitioner was found absent from duty for which she has submitted an explanation with necessary documents, then enquiry ought to have been conducted. If after enquiry the charges are found proved, then only the punishment order ought to have been passed: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The writ appeal is dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH V. SMT. NIRMALA RAWAT through HONR

No RTI can be filed to request “A” diaries of civil and criminal proceedings: Kerala High Court
No RTI can be filed to request “A” diaries of civil and criminal proceedings: Kerala High Court
August 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

No RTI can be filed to request “A” diaries of civil and criminal proceedings is upheld by the Kerala High Court in the case of M.P. Cho

Family Courts lack the authority to enjoin someone from performing talaq or a second marriage in accordance with personal law: Kerala High Court
Family Courts lack the authority to enjoin someone from performing talaq or a second marriage in accordance with personal law: Kerala High Court
August 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Family Courts lack the authority to enjoin someone from performing talaq or a second marriage in accordance with personal law is upheld by the Kera

The argument that the rape victim had reached majority and was happily cohabitating with the accused is not a viable premise or justification for dismissing the criminal proceedings: Kerala High Court
The argument that the rape victim had reached majority and was happily cohabitating with the accused is not a viable premise or justification for dismissing the criminal proceedings: Kerala High Court
August 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The argument that the rape victim had reached majority and was happily cohabitating with the accused is not a viable premise or justification for d

The exemption from payment of tax payable under section 9 and 10 of Madhya Pradesh Vanijyik Kar Adhiniyam, 1994 was given to the petitioner. In the Month of December 2004, the State Government has inserted section 10-B by way of amendment and thereby notified ‘Soybean’ as goods for payment of entry tax. After the amendment, the respondent has issued notice to the petitioner for payment of tax: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 26, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The writ petition stands allowed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of DEWAS SOYA LIMITED V. COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAX DEPTT

S.231(2) is a tool available to the defense to defer the cross examination of the prosecution witnesses until other witnesses are examined, this is for the reason that many a times the defense of an accused cannot be opened at the initial stage which may allow the other prosecution witnesses to be prepared for the same: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
S.231(2) is a tool available to the defense to defer the cross examination of the prosecution witnesses until other witnesses are examined, this is for the reason that many a times the defense of an accused cannot be opened at the initial stage which may allow the other prosecution witnesses to be prepared for the same: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 26, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Miscellaneous Criminal Case stands allowed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of RAVI V. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH through

Section 139A of the Act of 1961 mandates that every citizen shall have a Permanent Account Number if his total income exceeds the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income tax: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
Section 139A of the Act of 1961 mandates that every citizen shall have a Permanent Account Number if his total income exceeds the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income tax: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 26, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The writ petition stands disposed of by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of RAMCHANDRA HARYANI V. UNION OF INDIA through HON̵

MPERC is a special authority constituted under the Indian Electricity Act as well as the M.P. Electricity Supply Code to decide the dispute between the consumer and the licensee / Company under the M.P. Electricity Supply Code 2013: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
MPERC is a special authority constituted under the Indian Electricity Act as well as the M.P. Electricity Supply Code to decide the dispute between the consumer and the licensee / Company under the M.P. Electricity Supply Code 2013: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 25, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The writ appeal stands allowed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of MADHYA PRADESH PASHCHIM KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN COMPANY LIMIT