E-CONTRACT : THE CONTRACT IN ONLINE MODE
December 24, 2022by Primelegal Team
E contracts are modern contracts, unlike traditional contracts they don’t use papers they are digital and are generally made for swift enteri
It is necessary to generate revenue for the development of the State but, at the same time, the State is duty bound to consider the rights of the public at large: The Uttarakhand high court
December 23, 2022by Primelegal Team
The Uttarakhand high court passed a judgement on 22nd September 2022. This was seen in the case of Suresh Chandra Goyal v. state of Uttarakhand and
For the want of certificates, any assessment of income would be somehow guess work. The court always tries to reach as near as possible to the exact income of a person. Unfortunately, the courts do not have any formulae by which the salary of a person could be assessed, exactly: The Uttarakhand High court
December 23, 2022by Primelegal Team
The Uttarakhand high court passed a judgement on 24th June 2022 in the case Harun Rashid V. Smt. Ujma Siddhique and Another (Criminal Revision No.
KARNATAKA HC AWARDS MONETARY RELIEF FOR A PERSON SUFFERING IRRESVERISABLE MOTOR ACCIDENTAL LOSS
December 23, 2022by Primelegal Team
In the matter of Sri Krishnegowda vs M/S Royal Sundaram Allianz … on 22 November, 2022(M.F.A.NO.668/2014 (MV-I)) presided by THE HON’BL
I DO NOT FIND ANY IMPEDIMENT FOR ADMITTING PETITIONER ON BAIL. FURTHER, THE APPREHENSIONS RAISED BY THE LEARNED HCGP CAN BE METED OUT BY IMPOSING CERTAIN CONDITIONS SAYS KARNATAKA HC
December 23, 2022by Primelegal Team
In the matter of Vishnu P @ Vishnu vs The State Of Karnataka on 22 November, 2022(CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9859 of 2022) presided by THE HON’BLE
THE TRIBUNAL CANNOT COMES TO THE CONCLUSION THAT HE ALSO CONTRIBUTED TO THE ALLEGED ACCIDENT AND THE POLICE HAVE INVESTIGATED THE MATTER AND FILED THE CHARGE- SHEET AGAINST THE OFFENDING VEHICLE AND THE SAME IS NOT QUESTIONED SAYS KARNATAKA HC
December 23, 2022by Primelegal Team
In the matter of R Nagaraj vs G Ananda on 22 November, 2022 (M.F.A.No.6357/2014 (MV-I) presided by THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH state
I DO NOT FIND ANY IMPEDIMENT FOR ADMITTING THE PETITIONER ON BAIL AS THE OFFENCES ALLEGED ARE NOT PUNISHABLE WITH DEATH OR LIFE OF IMPRISONMENT AND ARE TRIABLE BY THE LEARNED MAGISTRATE
December 23, 2022by Primelegal Team
In the matter Sri B D Rameshkumar vs State Of Karnataka on 22 November, 2022(Criminal petition no.9555 of 2022) presided by THE HON’BLE MR. J
The anticipatory bail can be granted only in exceptional circumstances where the court is prima facie of the view that the applicant has falsely been enroped in the offence. Being an extraordinary remedy, it should be restored to only in a special case: The Uttarakhand high court
December 22, 2022by Primelegal Team
The Uttarakhand high court passed a judgement on 6th June 2022 in the case Rahul vishnoi v. state of Uttarakhand and others (SECOND ANTICIPATORY BA
Writ of habeas corpus cannot be issued, where the detention is authorised by the order of a Court of competent jurisdiction: The Uttarakhand High court
December 22, 2022by Primelegal Team
the Uttarakhand high court passed a judgement on 19th April 2021 in the case Sharukh v. state of Uttarakhand and others (HABEAS CORPUS PETITION NO.
Acts of constitutional functionaries, and persons holding high offices, which are tainted by nepotism, jobbery, or self- aggrandizement at the cost of the public exchequer, (when millions of Indian citizens hardly have adequate means of survival, and find it extremely difficult to eke out their livelihood each day), should not be disregarded. Legislative support, to such acts of theirs, violates the doctrine of equality laid down in Article 14 and must, unhesitatingly, be declared void and unenforceable: The Uttarakhand High Court
December 21, 2022by Primelegal Team
the Uttarakhand high court passed a judgement on 9th June 2020 in the case Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra v. State of Uttarakhand and othe
