blog - Page 39 of 983 - Prime Legal Law Firm

The appellant snatched the camera, leading to a scuffle between the victim and the appellant, along with other accused individuals.- Karnataka HC

Case Title: SRI DILIP versus THE STATE OF KARNATAKA and others Case No: CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.809 OF 2024 Decided on: 16th May , 2024 Quorum: THE HON&

“Ensuring Equal Educational Opportunities: Baby Angel’s Admission Denial”

Case Title: BABY ANGEL versus SACHDEVA PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ANR. Case No: W.P.(C) 2124/2024 Decided on: 29th February , 2024 Quorum: HON’BLE MR. JUS

The petitioner doesn’t comply with the co owners’ instructions, can proceed with further actions – Karnataka HC

Case Title: SHRI M R VIJAYA KUMAR versus ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER and others Case No: WP No. 13571 of 2024 Decided on: 21st May , 2024 Quorum:

The petition requests the Trial Court to expedite the application for condonation of delay – Karnataka HC

Case Title: SMT. KALAMMA and others versus SRI NARASIMHAMURTHY and others Case No: WRIT PETITION NO. 13525 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) Decided on: 21st May ,

Consideration of Senior Scale Criteria and Allegations of Discrimination: Delhi HC

Case Title: GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Versus JAY PRAKASH SOJA Case No: WP No. W.P.(C) 4640/2021 Decided on: 28th March , 2024 Quorum: HON

“Balancing Liberty and Trial Attendance: A Closer Look at the Recent Bail Judgement”

Case Title: BANADIK and others Versus STATE Case No: BAIL APPLN. 2211/2022 & CRL.M.As. 34090/2023 & 34091/2023 Decided on: 28th March , 202

Grant of recovery rights as against the registered owner of the offending vehicle, cannot be sustained in law:Delhi High Court

CASE TITTLE: SANDEEP YADAV. versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. CASE NO: MAC.APP. 39/2022& CM APPL. 7486/2022 ORDER ON: 20 May 2024 QUORUM: . J

Delhi High Court Rullings:‘other liability’ encompasses all distinct forms of liabilities but not limited to the liability undertaken as a guarantor.

CASE TITTLE: MRS SANTOSH RANI DHARIWAL V STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR CASE NO: CRL.M.C. 6017/2023 & CRL.M.A. 22555/2023 ORDER ON: 28.0

Delhi High Court: Quashes Complaint under Section 138 of NI Act Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence

Delhi High Court: Quashes Complaint under Section 138 of NI Act Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence Case title: GARHWAL JEMS AND JEWELLERY PVT. L

Verizon Secures Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case Against VRIZON, Delhi High Court Rules

Verizon Secures Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case Against VRIZON, Delhi High Court Rules Case title: VERIZON TRADEMARK SER

Blogs And Articles