Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Invalid Assumption Of Jurisdiction: Orissa High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Against Vedanta
Invalid Assumption Of Jurisdiction: Orissa High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Against Vedanta
March 26, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The high court bench of Orissa comprising Chief Justice Dr. S. Muralidhar and Justice M.S. Raman observed that under Section 127(2)(a), no transfer

Mosquito Repellent ‘Good Knight’ Is An Insecticide, 4% VAT Applicable: Orissa High Court
Mosquito Repellent ‘Good Knight’ Is An Insecticide, 4% VAT Applicable: Orissa High Court
March 26, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Facts of the Case: The high court bench of Orissa comprising Chief Justice S. Muralidhar and Justice M.S. Raman has upheld the tribunal’s ord

ANIMAL CRUELTY vis-à-vis ANIMAL RAPE : IN INDIA
ANIMAL CRUELTY vis-à-vis ANIMAL RAPE : IN INDIA
March 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

“The idea of Humanity is no longer confined to man; it is beginning to extend itself to the lower animals, as in the past it has been gradually e

327 ITR 456/193" headline="" subheadline="<span class="btArticleDate">March 24, 2023</span><span class="btArticleAuthor"><a href="https://blog.primelegal.in/author/anik/" class="btArticleAuthorURL">by Primelegal Team</a></span><a href="https://blog.primelegal.in/case-summary-ge-india-technology-cen-p-ltd-v-cit-2010-327-itr-456-193/#comments" class="btArticleComments">0</a>" font="" font_weight="" font_size="" color_scheme="" color="" align="" url="https://blog.primelegal.in/case-summary-ge-india-technology-cen-p-ltd-v-cit-2010-327-itr-456-193/" target="_self" html_tag="h2" size="normal" dash="" el_id="" el_class="" el_style="" supertitle_position="outside" ignore_fe_editor="true"]

Facts The Supreme Court took into consideration the facts presented in the lead suit, which was called Sonata Information Technology Ltd. The respo

Anti-Defection Law Landmark Cases:
Anti-Defection Law Landmark Cases:
March 24, 2023by Primelegal Team0

2019 v. Hon. Speaker, Karnataka Legislative Assembly, Shrimanth Balasaheb Patil In this relatively recent decision, the petitioners contested the S

Timeline of Cases on Doctrine of Severability:
Timeline of Cases on Doctrine of Severability:
March 24, 2023by Primelegal Team0

State of Bombay v. FN Balsara The Bombay Prohibition Act of 1949’s scope and whether alcohol-infused medications and toiletries fall under it

R.M.D.C v. the State of Bombay
R.M.D.C v. the State of Bombay
March 24, 2023by Primelegal Team0

A case’s facts The Prize Competitions Act (42 of 955), Sections 4 and 5, and Regulation 11 and 12 created under Section 20 of the Act were al

Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co Ltd [1894] AC 535
AC 535" headline="" subheadline="<span class="btArticleDate">March 24, 2023</span><span class="btArticleAuthor"><a href="https://blog.primelegal.in/author/anik/" class="btArticleAuthorURL">by Primelegal Team</a></span><a href="https://blog.primelegal.in/nordenfelt-v-maxim-nordenfelt-guns-and-ammunition-co-ltd-1894-ac-535/#comments" class="btArticleComments">0</a>" font="" font_weight="" font_size="" color_scheme="" color="" align="" url="https://blog.primelegal.in/nordenfelt-v-maxim-nordenfelt-guns-and-ammunition-co-ltd-1894-ac-535/" target="_self" html_tag="h2" size="normal" dash="" el_id="" el_class="" el_style="" supertitle_position="outside" ignore_fe_editor="true"]

Facts Swedish gun manufacturer Thorsten Nordenfelt, the appellant, operated a significant, global business. He agreed to engage into a restrictive

3-year-old child cannot be expected to describe private parts: Bombay High Court upholds POCSO conviction
March 24, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Bombay High Court passed a order on 13 March, 2023.This was seen in the case of Mahadev Gaur Bishwas  v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr 44

Doctrine of Severability
Doctrine of Severability
March 24, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Section III, or the basic rights, also became operative with the 1950 ratification of the Indian Constitution. A set of inalienable rights known as