Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The expression “if any” specifically used in Section 69A of the Act amplifies that where books of account are not maintained, it would not be possible to invoke this provision- Delhi HC
The expression “if any” specifically used in Section 69A of the Act amplifies that where books of account are not maintained, it would not be possible to invoke this provision- Delhi HC
December 19, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX versus HERSH WASHESHER CHADHA + ITA 676/2023 Decided on: 12.12.2023 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SH

Contempt of Court excludes casual, accidental, bona fide or unintentional acts or genuine inability. – Delhi HC
Contempt of Court excludes casual, accidental, bona fide or unintentional acts or genuine inability. – Delhi HC
December 19, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: M/S KUEHNE + NAGEL PVT. LTD. V MR. PREM SINGHEE + CCP(CO.) – 1/2015 & CO.APPL. 846/2023 Decided on: 15 December, 2023 CORAM: HON&#

The aim of the rules of natural justice is to serve justice or to put it negatively to prevent miscarriage of justice – High court of Patna
December 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

  The aim of the rules of natural justice is to serve justice or to put it negatively to prevent miscarriage of justice – High court of

In Case Of Sexual assault the medical evidence is more important to prove the guilt of Accused- High court of Patna
December 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

  In Case Of Sexual assault the medical evidence is more important to prove the guilt of Accused- High court of Patna  TITLE-LAXMAN YADAV VS

While exercising the appellate review under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the court cannot second guess, the decision of the Arbitrator. – Delhi HC
While exercising the appellate review under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the court cannot second guess, the decision of the Arbitrator. – Delhi HC
December 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI V M/S EDUCOMP SOLUTION LTD. + FAO (COMM) 122/2021 Decided on: 15th December, 2023 CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE YAS

The plaintiff’s options for legal action were restricted to suing for unpaid consideration or claiming damages, as the sale and transfer of the shares had already been completed. – Delhi HC
The plaintiff’s options for legal action were restricted to suing for unpaid consideration or claiming damages, as the sale and transfer of the shares had already been completed. – Delhi HC
December 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Shasvat Nakrani Versus Ashneer Grover Decided on: 15.12.2023 + CS(COMM) 166/2023 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA Facts of the

The Madras High Court noted that upon withdrawal of accusations, an employee regains promotion opportunities, and a second charge memo does not legally bar consideration for promotion in a specific panel year.
The Madras High Court noted that upon withdrawal of accusations, an employee regains promotion opportunities, and a second charge memo does not legally bar consideration for promotion in a specific panel year.
December 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: K. Sivanandam Vs The State of Tamil Nadu and Others Case No: W.P.(MD). No.18344 of 2021 and WMP(MD). No.15152 of 2021 Decided on: 13th

Teachers cannot take the fall for the mistake of management during appointment of vacancy – Bombay HC
December 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Sandeep Chudaman Shinde v The State of Maharashtra CORAM : Hon’ble justice Ravindra V. Ghuge and Hon’ble Justice Y.G Khobragade DATE :

Education officer not in a higher pedestal than Administrative officers in the matters of promotion : Bombay HC
December 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Sheshrao Namdev Bade v The state of Maharashtra CORAM : Hon’ble justice Nitin Jamdar and Hon’ble Justice Manjusha Deshpande DATE : 15th

The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition, citing insufficient identification of accused officers in WhatsApp chats and highlighted limitations on the right to vent about an employee’s behavior outside the group.
The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition, citing insufficient identification of accused officers in WhatsApp chats and highlighted limitations on the right to vent about an employee’s behavior outside the group.
December 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: V.P.Murugan vs Joint Director of Agriculture, Theni and Others Case No: W.P.(MD). No.24785 of 2023 and WMP(MD). No.20972 of 2023 Decide