INTRODUCTION On 29 August 2026, the Bombay High Court, in Mohd Kasim Ahmad v. State of Maharashtra, disposed of a Public Interest Litigation challe
INTRODUCTION On 29 August 2026, the Bombay High Court, in Mohd Kasim Ahmad v. State of Maharashtra, disposed of a Public Interest Litigation challe
INTRODUCTION In the Supreme Court’s view, temporary resistance to an individual’s own compulsory medical examination, even though such examinat
INTRODUCTION A writ petition that sat unresolved for nearly two and a half decades finally got somewhere this month, though not because of what it
ABSTRACT Sustainable development began as a diplomatic compromise between environmental protection and economic growth, articulated in internationa
ABSTRACT “Arbitration is supposed to run on consent if you agree to it, and that’s the whole basis for being bound by it. So what happe
INTRODUCTION A trademark is the commercial signature by which a business distinguishes its goods or services from those of others, and registering
CASE NAME: Girish Nigonda Patil v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. CASE NUMBER: Writ Petition No. 3550 of 2025 COURT: High Court of Judicature at
CASE NAME: Manohar Sharad Pathare v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. CASE NUMBER: Writ Petition No. 3221 of 2026 COURT: High Court of Judic
CASE NAME: Setty Bhaskara Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh CITATION: APHC010548992009 CASE NUMBER: CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 793/2009 COURT: In the
INTRODUCTION The High Court of Delhi, in a judgment delivered by Justice A.J. Bhambhani on 25th August 2026, has declined to resolve a live confl