Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
PRIMELEGAL | Supreme Court Clarifies Equal Pay for Equal Work: Experience May Justify Different Salaries
PRIMELEGAL | Supreme Court Clarifies Equal Pay for Equal Work: Experience May Justify Different Salaries
September 18, 2026by Primelegal Team

PRIMELEGAL | Supreme Court Clarifies Equal Pay for Equal Work: Experience May Justify Different Salaries INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court has held th

PRIME LEGAL | Karnataka High Court Orders Sweeping Safety Measures Amid Massive Illegal Pg Operations In Bengaluru
PRIME LEGAL | Karnataka High Court Orders Sweeping Safety Measures Amid Massive Illegal Pg Operations In Bengaluru
September 18, 2026by Primelegal Team

INTRODUCTION Bengaluru’s paying guest economy has quietly become the city’s biggest unregulated housing sector, and the Karnataka High

PRIME LEGAL | NCLT Chennai Clarifies Cross-Border IBC Liability: Overseas Personal Guarantors Can Face Insolvency Proceedings
PRIME LEGAL | NCLT Chennai Clarifies Cross-Border IBC Liability: Overseas Personal Guarantors Can Face Insolvency Proceedings
September 17, 2026by Primelegal Team

CASE NAME: M Gagan Bothra v. Senthil Kumar CASE NUMBER: CP(IB)/96(CHE)/2025 with IA(IBC)/1384(CHE)/2025 COURT: National Company Law Tribunal, Divis

PRIME LEGAL | Supreme Court Bars Forced Vehicle Repossession, Awards ₹10 Lakh to Truck Owner for Financiers’ Misconduct
PRIME LEGAL | Supreme Court Bars Forced Vehicle Repossession, Awards ₹10 Lakh to Truck Owner for Financiers’ Misconduct
September 17, 2026by Primelegal Team

CASE NAME: Hari Dutta Sharma v State of UP & Ors CASE NUMBER: Civil Appeal No(s). of 2026 (@ S.L.P. (C) No(s). of 2026; @ Diary No. 10952 of 20

PRIMELEGAL | Supreme Court’s Gender-Justice Language Guide: ‘Prosecutrix’ Replaced by More Dignified, Neutral Terminology
PRIMELEGAL | Supreme Court’s Gender-Justice Language Guide: ‘Prosecutrix’ Replaced by More Dignified, Neutral Terminology
September 16, 2026by Primelegal Team

INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of India has recently brought out a handbook entitled “Judgments and Gender: Sensitivity and Compassion in Wri

PRIMELEGAL | Madras High Court Says Second Wife Unaware Of Husband’s Subsisting Marriage Cannot Be Prosecuted For Bigamy
PRIMELEGAL | Madras High Court Says Second Wife Unaware Of Husband’s Subsisting Marriage Cannot Be Prosecuted For Bigamy
September 16, 2026by Primelegal Team

INTRODUCTION The Madras High Court has stepped into a question that touches thousands of quiet, painful situations across India: what happens to a

PRIMELEGAL | Can Power Lines Cross Private Land Without the Owner’s Consent? MP High Court Explains Section 164
PRIMELEGAL | Can Power Lines Cross Private Land Without the Owner’s Consent? MP High Court Explains Section 164
September 15, 2026by Primelegal Team

CASE NAME: Daulat Ram Engineering Services Ltd v State of Madhya Pradesh CASE NUMBER: Writ Petition No. 49694 of 2025 with Writ Petition No. 32213

PRIME LEGAL | Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Britannia Dairy in Unsafe Cheese Cubes Case
PRIME LEGAL | Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Britannia Dairy in Unsafe Cheese Cubes Case
September 15, 2026by Primelegal Team

CASE NAME: Britannia Dairy Private Limited vs The State of Maharashtra & Ors CASE NUMBER: Criminal Application No. 842 of 2017 COURT: High Cour

PRIME LEGAL | Regulating Paid Securities Promotions on Social Media: Protecting Retail Investors in the Age of Finfluencers
PRIME LEGAL | Regulating Paid Securities Promotions on Social Media: Protecting Retail Investors in the Age of Finfluencers
September 12, 2026by Primelegal Team

ABSTRACT “The rise in the popularity of social media platforms has led to a change in the way that retail investors get their information regardi

PRIME LEGAL | The Blurred Line: A Critical Analysis Of Rule 36 Of The Bci Rules In The Context Of Legal Influencers
PRIME LEGAL | The Blurred Line: A Critical Analysis Of Rule 36 Of The Bci Rules In The Context Of Legal Influencers
September 12, 2026by Primelegal Team

ABSTRACT Under Section 49(1)(c) of the Advocates Act, 1961, the Rule 36 of Bar Council of India Rules have been framed which prohibits advocates fr