Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
PRIMELEGAL | Defamatory Brand Videos Can Be Taken Down: What the Bombay High Court’s Bisleri Order Means for Businesses
PRIMELEGAL | Defamatory Brand Videos Can Be Taken Down: What the Bombay High Court’s Bisleri Order Means for Businesses
November 4, 2026by Primelegal Team

Case Name: Bisleri International Private Limited v. Meta Platform Inc. & Ors. Case Number: Interim Appication (L) No. 37662 of 2026 in Suit (L)

PRIME LEGAL | Calcutta High Court: Companies Bear the Burden of Patent Clearance Before Launching Potentially Infringing Processes
PRIME LEGAL | Calcutta High Court: Companies Bear the Burden of Patent Clearance Before Launching Potentially Infringing Processes
November 4, 2026by Primelegal Team

Case Name: NOCIL Ltd. v. Finorchem Ltd. & Anr. Case Number: IA No. GA-COM/1/2024 in IP-COM/25/2024 Date of Judgment: 7 October 2026 Date of Hea

PRIME LEGAL | Fake Franchise Offers Using Your Brand? What the Bombay High Court’s Natural Ice Creams Order Means for Franchisors
PRIME LEGAL | Fake Franchise Offers Using Your Brand? What the Bombay High Court’s Natural Ice Creams Order Means for Franchisors
November 4, 2026by Primelegal Team

Case Name: Siddhant Ice Creams LLP & Anr. v. John Doe(s) & Ors. Case Number: Interim Application (L) No. 22104 of 2026 in Commercial IP Sui

PRIME LEGAL | SC Flags ‘scigovinjudicial.com’ as Phishing Domain: How to Spot Phishing Domains and Stay Safe Online
PRIME LEGAL | SC Flags ‘scigovinjudicial.com’ as Phishing Domain: How to Spot Phishing Domains and Stay Safe Online
November 4, 2026by Primelegal Team

Introduction In a serious caution to people, the Court Registry of Supreme Court of India on Friday issued a public advisory warning against a mali

PRIME LEGAL | Allahabad High Court Quashes Cheating Case Against IVF Doctor: Treatment Failure Alone Cannot Prove Dishonest Intent
PRIME LEGAL | Allahabad High Court Quashes Cheating Case Against IVF Doctor: Treatment Failure Alone Cannot Prove Dishonest Intent
November 3, 2026by Primelegal Team

Case Title: Dr. Sarita Teotia v. State of U.P. and Another Court: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Judge: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Chawan Prakash

PRIME LEGAL | Section 43D(7) UAPA: What Courts Have Held on Bail for Foreign Nationals
PRIME LEGAL | Section 43D(7) UAPA: What Courts Have Held on Bail for Foreign Nationals
November 3, 2026by Primelegal Team

INTRODUCTION  The Supreme Court of India in, Union of India v. Mohamed Rifas @ Mohamed Rigbas decided by a Bench of Aravind Kumar and Vipul M. Pan

PRIME LEGAL | Electricity Disconnected Over Theft Allegations? When High Courts Can Order Restoration
PRIME LEGAL | Electricity Disconnected Over Theft Allegations? When High Courts Can Order Restoration
November 3, 2026by Primelegal Team

Introduction  Electricity is an essential commodity necessary for both life and livelihood. Its deprivation may have serious and catastrophic cons

PRIME LEGAL | Fake Lottery Websites and Trademark Infringement: How to Hold Rogue Websites Liable
PRIME LEGAL | Fake Lottery Websites and Trademark Infringement: How to Hold Rogue Websites Liable
November 3, 2026by Primelegal Team

INTRODUCTION In the case of Reliance Industries Ltd. v. Rahul Meena, delivered by the Delhi High Court on 7th October 2026, an interim order was pa

PRIMELEGAL | Change of Registered Office During CIRP Without IRP Authority Is Impermissible; S.68 Punishment Not Established: NCLT
PRIMELEGAL | Change of Registered Office During CIRP Without IRP Authority Is Impermissible; S.68 Punishment Not Established: NCLT
November 2, 2026by Primelegal Team

Case Name: Rajendra Sanghi Liquidator for Nagaur Water Supply Company Pvt. Ltd vs. Rakshit Dhirajlal Doshi & Ors Case Number: I.A. No. 1068 of

PRIMELEGAL | Section 33(5) IBC Clarified: NCLT Kolkata Draws the Line Between Tax Assessment and Penalty Proceedings in Liquidation
PRIMELEGAL | Section 33(5) IBC Clarified: NCLT Kolkata Draws the Line Between Tax Assessment and Penalty Proceedings in Liquidation
November 2, 2026by Primelegal Team

Case Name: Gujarat NRE Coke Limited (through Mr. Sumit Binani, Liquidator) v. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, Ministry of Finance, Governme