Strong suspicion cannot take the place of proof: Supreme Court of India
Accused cannot be held convicted on the ground of suspicion, no matter how strong it is. An accused is presumed to be innocent unless proved guilty
Deputing Advocate Commissioner for identification of property doesn’t violate owner’s rights: Kerala High Court
Deputation of the Advocate Commissioner for measurement and identification of boundaries of a property does not violate the owner’s rights. On th
Unfounded allegations against the spouse for affecting his/her job amounts to mental cruelty: Bombay High Court
Making unfounded allegations against the spouse or his/her relatives in the pleadings or making complaints with a view to affecting the job of the
Parties settling disputes entitled for refund of court fees: Supreme Court of India
Parties who choose to withdraw their litigations in favor of more conciliatory dispute settlement mechanisms; saving them time and resources of the
E-auction to be considered ‘open market sale’ for exemption from scrutiny under Stamps Act: High court of Calcutta
Not only court sales and company sales but any open sale by any authority by public e-action on sufficiently wide circulation worth the name, inclu
Tax levied on land depends upon the nature of practice: Kerala High Court
The tax to be levied upon the owner of the land depends upon the nature of practice being carried out on the land. If by default, the property cove
Detention Order cannot be quashed on ground of delay in its execution: High court of Delhi
When the central agencies have passed a detention order of an individual for smuggling activities, such detention order cannot be cancelled merely
Statements made under Section 161 CrPC inadmissible as evidence to refuse bail: High Court of Delhi
When a police officer reduces into writing any statement made to him by a witness, in the course of investigation under Section 161 of CrPc, such a
The stage of Cognizance would only arise after the report of Investigation: Karnataka High Court
Referring the matter for investigation without the application of judicious mind, is nothing but an abuse of process. At the same time, that stage
Sale of shares reducing the extent of shareholding is inappropriate: Supreme Court of India
The instance where the sale of shares takes place with the purpose to reduce the extent of control of shareholding is inappropriate. The stage when
