Prosecution has to Complete the Chain of Evidences to prove Guilt: Gauhati High Court
To prove the guilt of the accused persons in a case on the basis of circumstantial evidence, the prosecution is required not only to prove the circ
The relief of monetary claims under Section 20 of the Domestic Violence Act is ancillary relief: Kerala High Court
If no right of the parties is decided conclusively in the proceedings, then outcome, if any, of such proceedings cannot be treated as an outcome of
Daughter caught in the crossfire of acrimony and matrimonial discord, domestic violence case filed against daughter quashed: Bombay High Court
The allegation levelled by the mother against the daughter are exaggerated and her anger and bitterness arising from matrimonial discord with her h
Proceedings initiated under Rule 43(b) of the Bihar Pension Rules cannot be converted under Rule 139(b): Jharkhand High Court
It is a settled legal proposition that if a proceeding has been initiated or not completed in course of service under Rule 43(b) of the Bihar Pensi
A simple comment that the complainant’s political support encouraged others to engage in immoral behavior would not be considered defamation: Tripura High Court
The mere statement that the complainant’s political support encouraged a person to get involved in immoral activities won’t be Defamati
While granting an interim injunction the Commercial Court can impose conditions on the Plaintiff to protect the Defendant: High Court of Karnataka
While granting an interim injunction on an application filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC, the Commercial Court can impose conditions on the Pla
Bar of Section 37 is not attracted for offenses alleged U/S 9A/25 A of the NDPS Act: High Court of Delhi
Section 9A which deals with controlled substances is concerned, there is no categorization of small quantity or commercial quantity. Therefore, the
High Courts to appoint ad-hoc judge under Art. 224A if vacancies are more than 20% of the sanctioned strength: Supreme Court
The court intended to activate the dormant provisions for the appointment of ad hoc Judges to deal with the unprecedented situation arising from th
Time-period of six months for cooling off u/S 13-B of HMA can be waived by the Court under special circumstances: Delhi High Court
In the matter concerned with mutual divorce u/S 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956, the Delhi High Court bench constituting Pratibha M. Singh J.
Daughter’s Right on Property
The status of women stayed receded for the majority of the time. It was only in 2005 with the introduction of the Hindu Succession Amendment Act wh
