Advocate can issue demand notice on behalf of operational creditor: NCLAT
Once an advocate was duly instructed to issue the demand notice, there was no room for holding that the notice delivered by the advocate was not a
Mere application filed under Rule 131 of NCLT is sufficient to direct an order to conduct forensic audit: NCLAT
There is nothing in the order to justify the directions for conducting a forensic audit of accounts of the Company due to its cryptic and non-speak
Conviction is not a nexus for parole: Bombay High Court
Grant or refusal of parole does not appear to have anything to do with either the conviction or the place of court convicting. Conviction appears t
Bounden duty of Court to provide legal assistance to an individual who is unable to engage a legal counsel: Madras High Court
Courts must mandatorily provide legal assistance through Legal Service Authority to an individual who is unable to afford or engage a legal counsel
Under S.438 Cr.P.C., the Court while granting relief to the applicant shall consider concerns of Investigating agency, complainant, and proviso to it: Supreme Court
While addressing an appeal against the order of the High Court under section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure, the supreme court held that while d
For an Offence under S.304B IPC, it is pertinent for Accused to rebut the Statutory Presumption under S.113B Evidence Act: Supreme Court
When an accused is booked under section 304B IPC, for an acquittal it is pertinent for them to rebut the statutory presumption created against the
The recovery of compound interest would not contravene any fundamental policy of Indian law: High Court of Delhi
It is also a norm of the banking industry to charge compound interest with either monthly or quarterly rests. Therefore an arbitral award cannot be
The practice of forum shopping by litigant should not be encouraged: High Court of Delhi
The withdrawal of the proceedings, even if with liberty to file afresh, does not obliterate the proceedings so filed, so as to make the same invisi
Every breach of contract would not give rise to an offence of cheating and only those cases breach of contract would amount to cheating, where there was any deception played at the very inception: Gauhati High Court
Any breach of contract would not give rise to a cheating offence and it would only be the cheating in those circumstances where any disappointment
The second complaint would not be maintainable where the earlier complaint has been disposed of on full consideration of the case on merit: Gauhati High Court
Law does not prohibit filing or entertaining second complaint even on the same facts, provided the earlier complaint has not been decided on the ba
