Primelegal Team, Author at Prime Legal Law Firm

Controversy has to be decided in totality by one Judicial platform available under law: High Court of Uttarakhand.

If the matter in question is already sub-judice before the Public Services Tribunal, which would be an appropriate platform available to the petiti

High court won’t have the jurisdiction when the appropriate authority is provided under a statutory provision: High Court of Uttarakhand.

Where a statutory provision mentions a competent authority, then a person seeking relief should approach that competent authority and not any other

An indirect relief cannot be chosen when a direct relief is available: High Court of Telangana

Parties cannot resort to methods which are elaborate and involve higher authorities when readily available reliefs are directly available. There ca

While considering an application under Section 7 of the IBC, only the financial debt being defaulted should be the criteria: NCLT, New Delhi

When deciding whether an application under section 7 of the insolvency and bankruptcy code must be allowed, reliance must be placed only and only

ITAT application should be heard afresh if the applicant was not given a fair chance to represent his case: High Court of Delhi

In an Income Tax Appellate Tribunal application where the applicant did not have adequate notice or a fait opportunity to represent his case, the T

Court fees will be refunded in any case where the dispute has been amicably settled between the parties: High Court of Delhi

The plaintiff will be entitled to getting a refund of the court fees in a case where the dispute has been settled amicably by the parties without t

Parole granted to the accused convicted under Section 22(c), 21(b) and 20(b) (ii) (B) of the NDPS Act: High Court Of Bombay at Goa

Parole may be granted to a petitioner in the event of emergent situations like death or serious illness of father, mother, brother, sister, spouse,

Remission matters should go back to the First Appellate Authority for reconsideration rather than the Commissioner: High Court of Bombay at Goa

When a party’s contention is disposed of without assigning any reason, it is only appropriate that the matter should go back to the First App

The petitioner shall abide by the conditions stipulated under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.: High court of Punjab and Haryana

The petitioner was convicted under section 380 of the Indian penal code 1860, i.e., “Theft in dwelling house, etc.—Whoever commits theft in any

Petitioner did not comply with the direction of the Appellate Court in terms of Section 148 of the NI Act: High court of Punjab and Haryana

According to section 148 of the negotiable instrument act,1885, “power of the appellate court to order payment pending appeal against conviction.

Blogs And Articles