Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Non-­mentioning  of the probation period in their appointment orders cannot deprive from benefits to which they are otherwise entitled: Chhattisgarh High court
July 23, 2021by Primelegal Team0

In the present case, the question of law and fact is the same in all these writs and hence they were clubbed together. The petitioners in the prese

Petitioner charged for offences punishable under Sections 328, 389 and 34 IPC, granted bail: The High Court of Delhi
July 23, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Just because the complainant is alleging that he is getting threatening calls, it will not be appropriate to keep the accused in custody and the Co

Mere complaints of threatening call, is not an appropriate reason to keep the accused in custody: High Court of Delhi.
July 23, 2021by Primelegal Team0

When there is no substantial reason to detain the accused in custody, against whom a complaint had been registered, then such accused can be grante

No person shall drive a motor vehicle in any public place unless he holds an effective driving licence issued to him authorising him to drive the vehicle.: High court of Punjab and Haryana
July 22, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The petitioner was convicted under section 279 Indian Penal Code, i.e. “Rash driving or riding on a public way. i.e., Whoever drives any vehicle,

Petitioner denied to seek refund of excess advance tax on the grounds of it being a stale claim: The High Court of Delhi
July 22, 2021by Primelegal Team0

It is settled law that representations made by the Petitioner would not extend the period of limitation. The aforesaid law has also been relied upo

Failure by CIT(A) and ITAT to disclose incriminating material against the accused led to the court finding no substantial question of law arising in the case, hence leading to its dismissal: The High court of Delhi
Failure by CIT(A) and ITAT to disclose incriminating material against the accused led to the court finding no substantial question of law arising in the case, hence leading to its dismissal: The High court of Delhi
July 22, 2021by Primelegal Team0

No assessment/reassessment proceedings were pending when search action took place and hence no assessment was abated. The addition made by the AO i

Bail granted to one Convicted under section 15,61,85 of the NDPS act because she had a child: High court of Punjab and Haryana
July 22, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The petitioner was convicted under section 15-B of the NDPS act, “Punishment for contravention in relation to poppy straw, where the contraventio

Where the wife has sufficient income to maintain herself, she will not qualify for getting alimony for herself: Calcutta High Court.
Where the wife has sufficient income to maintain herself, she will not qualify for getting alimony for herself: Calcutta High Court.
July 22, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Within the contemplation of section 36 of the Special Marriage Act, a wife will not qualify for getting alimony for herself, if she has sufficient

Claiming refund of the excess advance tax beyond the period of limitation is a stale claim: High Court of Delhi.
July 22, 2021by Primelegal Team0

In the year 2021, a person cannot seek a refund of the excess advance tax deposited for the Assessment Year 2000-01, as it is would be considered a

Adverse possession cannot be established without proving the essential ingredients, nec vi, nec clam and nec precario: High Court of Chhattisgarh
July 22, 2021by Primelegal Team0

For a person to prove that they has the right over some property through adverse possession, they must fulfil the essential ingredients: (i) nec vi