Regulation of Crypto-tokens in India
Every crypto-token or altcoin has one thing in common. They break down the geographical impediment of finding investors by holding the token offeri
If the tenancy claim is for any term exceeding one year, the tenancy can be made only by a registered instrument.: Supreme Court of India
If a tenant claims that he is entitled to possession of a Secured Asset for a term of more than a year, it has to be supported by the execution of
Witnesses can be the culprits and this aspect mustn’t be overlooked: Supreme Court of India
There cannot be a fixed formula that the prosecution has to prove or need not prove that the blood group matches. However, the judicial conscience
The provisions of Section 7 and Rule 40 it was imperative that the resignation should be in the handwriting of the employee and should bear the date and his signature: High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
In the present case, the petitioner is an employee of the School of which Respondent No.1 is a secretary, Respondent 2 is the Headmistress, and Res
Where the contract specifies the jurisdiction of the court at a particular place, only such court will have the jurisdiction to deal with the matter: The High Court of Jammu And Kashmir And Ladakh
In the present case, the parties have agreed that the “venue” of arbitration shall be at Bhubaneswar. Considering the agreement of the parties
Bail will not be granted when the accused has shown tendency to abscond or to threaten the complainant: High Court of Delhi
In a criminal trial where the accused person appears to have absconded or is likely to threaten the witnesses and tamper with the outcome of the tr
“Appellant Authority found that the respondent is not obliged to provide information where the query is vague and not specific.”: SEBI, Part 3.
Without prejudice to the above observation, it was noted that the respondent has provided the Action History and the Action Taken report with respe
“Appellant Authority found that the respondent is not obliged to provide information where the query is vague and not specific.”: SEBI, Part 2.
Further, information was provided regarding approval of adjudication proceedings in the matter of Varun Global Ltd. the appellant was informed that
Bail to be issued on merits and on the ground of prolonged incarceration, which infringes his right to life and personal liberty : Bombay High Court
Trial decides the fate of the accused as either guilty or innocent, however an accused shouldn’t be incarcerated unjustly for a long period of ti
The Court finds prima facie an offense and the petitioner is not maintainable due to bar of Section 76(2) under Bihar Prohibition Excise Act, 2016: High court of Patna
The petitioner was arrested under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. This is in connection with Sherghati PS Case No. 354
