Rules of limitation are not meant to destroy the right of the parties: High Court of Bombay at Goa
Rules of limitation are not meant to destroy the right of the parties. They are meant to see that parties do not resort to dilatory tactics but see
Claimant granted excessive compensation on account of disability caused which will have a bearing on his earning capacity and employability: The High Court of Karnataka
Commissioner on appreciation of material before him has given a finding that claimant had suffered loss of earning capacity to the extent of 20%. T
Other things being equal between competing candidates, seniority is to be given due weightage in matters of promotion: The Supreme Court of India
With regard to promotion the normal principles are either merit-cum-seniority or seniority-cum merit. Seniority-cum-merit means that given the mini
Order of High Court held unsustainable based on erroneous appreciation of facts: The Supreme Court of India
A serious error was committed by high court while examining the claim of appellant under rule 6(1) (c) which deals with the migration for the purpo
Any Judicial Magistrate, before taking cognizance of the offence, can order investigation under Section 156(3) of the Code: The Supreme Court of India
Court observed that once the Magistrate takes cognizance of an offence, the procedure which is enunciated in Chapter XV has to be followed. The inv
Application of bail rejected due to adverse evidences against the Applicant: High Court Of Chhattisgarh.
In the present case, the first bail application is filed under Sec 439 CrPC by the applicant who has been arrested on 20.01.2021 registered at Poli
Accused will not be kept in custody merely because the complainant was allegedly getting threatening calls from him: High Court of Delhi
Having made threatening phone calls to the complainant or a co-accused person absconding are not valid grounds to deny bail to an accused person wh
A Government employee should strictly follow the Government guidelines for medical reimbursement bills: High Court of Tripura.
A person who is a government employee is only liable to claim medical reimbursement bills when such person has followed the government guidelines f
A miner is only required to pay royalty on the quantity he removed even if the MoU is silent on the matter: High Court of Uttarakhand
The state cannot make a miner pay royalty on quantity of minerals that he did not remove from the mine, irrespective of whether it is explicitly me
Property owned by the Airport Authority of India cannot be exempted for tax: Madras High Court
A property owned by the Airports Authority of India cannot be treated as a property of the Central Government and cannot be exempted for tax under
