Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
“The appellant was also advised to refer to the website for updated information from time to time.”: SEBI, Part 3.
August 17, 2021by Primelegal Team0

In this context, it was noted that in the matter of Shri S. C. Sharma vs. CPIO, Securities and Exchange Board of India (Decision dated August 30, 2

“The appellant was also advised to refer to the website for updated information from time to time.”: SEBI, Part 2.
August 17, 2021by Primelegal Team0

It was noted that the appellant sought reasons for default of brokers. On perusal of the query, it appears that the same is in the nature of seekin

Arbitration proceeding to be disposed by the dist. Judge on its own merits and cannot be interfered by the parties: High Court of Bombay at Goa
August 17, 2021by Primelegal Team0

A challenge petition is preferred by the petitioner against the order passed by the Dist.  judge granting the stay to the execution of award. It w

The court does not inspire confidence with regard to their innocence and rejects pre-arrest bail to the petitioners arrested under Sections 304-B/34 IPC: High court of Patna
August 17, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The petitioners were arrested under Section 304-B, “Dowry death”, section 34IPC, “Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common inten

The Court declined to reconsider the prayer for bail as the petitioner was arrested under Sections 25(1-B)(a)/26/35 of the Arms Act,1959.: High court of Patna
The Court declined to reconsider the prayer for bail as the petitioner was arrested under Sections 25(1-B)(a)/26/35 of the Arms Act,1959.: High court of Patna
August 17, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The petitioner was held in custody under Sections 25(1-B) (a) Arms Act, 1959, “acquires, has in his possession or carries any firearm or ammuniti

Petitioner who is a married person and has children to support, need not be kept in incarceration when his presence during trial can be ensured by stringent terms and conditions: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh
August 17, 2021by Primelegal Team0

In most of the cases it is not possible to prove agreement between the conspirators by direct evidence but the same can be inferred from the circum

Merely because there is land dispute between the parties, the conviction of the petitioners cannot be interfered : Jharkhand High Court
Merely because there is land dispute between the parties, the conviction of the petitioners cannot be interfered : Jharkhand High Court
August 17, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Convictions cannot be overturned when there is cogent and consistent materials on record, to sustain the conviction of the petitioners. This was he

When matter is amicably settled between the parties, the complainants should be permitted to compound such offences against the applicants: High Court of Uttarakhand.
August 16, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Where the petitioner and respondent had amicably settled the dispute and the complainants do not want to prosecute the petitioner further, therefor

The petitioner was released on bail after being arrested under Sections 30(a), 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.: High court of Patna
August 16, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The petitioner was arrested under Sections 30(a), 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. This is in connection with Chapra Town P

The petitioners were released on bail after accusation of procuration of a minor girl under Section 366A IPC: High court of Patna
The petitioners were released on bail after accusation of procuration of a minor girl under Section 366A IPC: High court of Patna
August 16, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The petitioners were arrested under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code, “Procuration of a minor girl, whoever, by any means whatso­ever, indu