The petitioner was taken into custody under Section 498A IPC, “Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty”, section 50
In the proceedings dated 09.08.2021, learned counsel submitted on behalf of the appellant that he was willing to pay compensation of Rs.3.00 lakhs
In context of the Criminal Appeal No .894 Of 2021, Samaul Sk. vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr., Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul passed the judgment
Any material that could be potentially defamatory, cannot be shared or forwarded carelessly especially in this modern day and age of internet. This
The Supreme Court ruled that the railways would be liable for compensation unless they provided proof and explained why a train arrived late, estab
The Supreme Court ruled that by following the procedure outlined in Section 25 of the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003, a Director of Enforce
The default was suppose to undergo simple Imprisonment for a period of one month, this was held in the judgement passed by a single bench judge com
It appeared that the power under Section 482 Crpc cannot be exercised by this Court to re-appreciate the same material, which was available before
It appeared that the in case of a proprietary firm if the relationship between the firm and the proprietor is clear and not in dispute then it does
The petitioner was taken into custody under Sections 498A IPC, “Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty”, section 3
We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.
Prime Legal, 4 No Fairle Place, H
MP House 5TH Floor Room No :501, PIN:700001