Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The Court finds  prima facie an offense and the petitioner is not maintainable due to bar of Section 76(2) under Bihar Prohibition Excise Act, 2016: High court of Patna
August 20, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The petitioner was arrested under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. This is in connection with Sherghati PS Case No. 354

The Court is inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioners held in custody under Sections 363, 366-A, 504/34 IPC: High court of Patna
August 20, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The petitioner was taken into custody under Section 363 of the India Penal Code, “Punishment for kidnapping”, section 366-A, “Procuration of

Government is free to set terms of tender unless it is arbitrary, malafide or discriminatory: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
Government is free to set terms of tender unless it is arbitrary, malafide or discriminatory: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
August 20, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The court will not interfere in the matter of terms and conditions of a tender issued by the government unless, they are blatantly discriminatory,

No requirement for criminal process to go on to settle the dispute, when the matter is a civil land dispute: High Court of Uttarakhand.
August 20, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Where the dispute is one of a civil nature relating to the land in question and the criminal process is being used to settle that dispute and the d

Eviction by the Tribunal should only be an incident of the enforcement of the right to maintenance and protection under the 2007 Act : Bombay High Court
August 20, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The elderly parents, citizens and women are justly protected by the law under the provisions of several Acts to ensure that they aren’t exploited

In case of re-analysis, the Disciplinary Authority is not the final judge of facts: High Court of Bombay at Goa
August 20, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Re-analysis and Re-appreciation of the evidence brought on record in a duly constituted departmental enquiry on the principle that the Disciplinary

“Appellant Authority found that the respondent is not obliged to provide information where the query is vague and not specific.”: SEBI, Part 1.
August 20, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The appellate authority under the RTI (Right to Information) Act of the Securities and Exchange Board of India comprising of Mr. Anand Baiwar adjud

“Exit load charged by Asset Management Companies (AMCs) in various mutual fund schemes, is not maintained by SEBI…”: SEBI, Part 2.
August 20, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Further, it was noted that the Hon’ble CIC in the matter of Sh. Pattipati Rama Murthy vs. CPIO, SEBI (Decision dated July 8, 2013), held: “…

“Exit load charged by Asset Management Companies (AMCs) in various mutual fund schemes, is not maintained by SEBI…”: SEBI, Part 1.
August 20, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Exchange Board of India comprising of Mr. Anand Baiwar adjudicated in the matter of Vinod Kumar Agarwal v CPIO, SEBI, Mumbai (Appeal No. 4369 of 2

“Appellant files appeal after approximately eight months after the last date permissible under the RTI Act.”: SEBI, Part 3.
August 19, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Further, such examination or investigation may or may not establish the suspected violations or lead to enforcement actions. Maintaining confidenti