No grounds found for interference in the matter of an arbitral award: Delhi High Court
In a separate suit filed in the Delhi High Court, under the purview of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, the judges opined that in the matters
The Court declined pre-arrest bail to the petitioner as he remarried without taking steps to restore his matrimonial relationship: High court of Patna
The petitioner was arrested under section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, “Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty”
The petitioners were released on bail after being arrested under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 of the IPC and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959.: High court of Patna
The petitioner was taken into custody under Sections 147, “ Punishment for rioting”, section 148, “Rioting, armed with a deadly weapon”, se
Accident claim -vehicle registered and insured in India – Accident in Nepal-Insurance Company liable to pay compensation – No extra premium can be charged for third party insurance even for extra territorial coverage: Punjab and Haryana High Court
It appeared that the competence of ‘India Motor Tariff’ to issue such instruction to limit the liability of the Insurance Company in te
Merely because complaint u/s138 NIA is filed–is no ground to quash the separate FIR u/s420/406 IPC. Offences u/s138 NIA and u/s 420/406 IPC not mutually exclusive. Both can go on side-be-side. No double jeopardy: Punjab and Haryana High Court
It appeared that Article 20 of the Constitution of India prohibits the conviction of a person twice for the ‘same offence’ and not for
Challenging the NEET All India Quota of 27% OBC and 10% EWS reservations following Madras HC’s Judgement: Supreme Court
On Monday, the Supreme Court issued a notice in a writ suit challenging the Central Government’s intention to adopt a 27 per cent OBC and 10%
Amendment that is merely seeking to refer to specific instances in support of the assertions in the plaint is necessary for a complete adjudication of the dispute between the parties : Delhi High Court
The court always views both parties equally and defends the right to assert their point of view and stance equally. This was held in the judgment p
When a Tribunal which is the highest fact finding authority has given a categorical finding, the Court has no reason to interfere : Delhi High Court
A Tribunal is established to ensure that it categorizes and analyses the required categories justly, however the court will find no reason to quest
The account which is frenzied by the order of the special court will not be operated : High Court of New Delhi .
The extra amount which was received from one of the parties is to be impugned transaction and also it can’t be prima facie termed as case propert
Conditions that can lead to a presumption of abetment of suicide by a married woman under Section 113A of the Evidence Act: Supreme Court
In the matter of Gumansinh @ Lalo @ Raju Bhikhabhai Chauhan Vs. State Of Gujrat LL 2021 SC 415 the Supreme Court augmented that three circumstanc
