In an IntraCourt Mandamus appeal, interference is usually warranted only when palpable infirmities or perversities are noticed as held by the Honâ€
In an IntraCourt Mandamus appeal, interference is usually warranted only when palpable infirmities or perversities are noticed as held by the Honâ€
No doubt while framing the charge, no reasons are required to be given but nonetheless, once the learned trial court mentions in its order that the
When there’s a reasonable apprehension of arrest then the person is entitled to approach the competent court of jurisdiction for relief and if he
Prescription of age limit and relaxation is made in furtherance of the policy of the State, and the same constitutes a policy decision made, which
The Petitioner was alleged to have tried to kidnap the two girls and forcefully taking them to a place. The girls managed to escape and informed a
The Petitioner was alleged for taking huge amounts from the informant in the name of giving a job in the Civil Court which turned out to be false a
Mere production of the extract of the recorded version or even such verification of voice of the accused only is not sufficiently held by Hon’ble
It is the responsibility of the State to protect everyone, more specifically the population of weaker sections from any hardship that may aggravate
The petitioners were alleged of killing the informant’s daughter or their Daughter-in-Law. The FIR of the same was done by the village people
The Appellant moved to the Court for revising the previous judgment of his acquittal and plead that since the witnesses who supported him werenR