Cross-cases shall be tried by one and the same court: Allahabad High Court
Cross-cases or counter-cases are two different of the same incident, resulting in two criminal cases. Therefore, they should be tried by the same c
Every person who is of age and of sound mind can be appointed as an arbitrator.: High Court Of New Delhi
The present petition was filed under the provisions of Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of sole
It is of no use to keep seized vehicles at the police stations for a long period : High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh
The only purpose for releasing of the vehicle is to ensure that the vehicle remains, roadworthy otherwise if the same is allowed to remain in polic
It is the bounden duty of every Court to verify personally that the summons was served in accordance with law: High Court of Chhattisgarh
The Court shall always be justified in proceeding ex parte if it is convinced that the defendant or the opposite party despite service of the summo
Failure to effectively communicate the grounds of detention and resultant deprivation of the right to make representation against the same vitiates the detention order: High Court of J&K and Ladakh
Grounds of detention being drawn up in English and an affidavit filed on behalf of the detaining authority is not a sufficient compliance with the
If relevant material is not supplied to the detenu, the right of the detenu to file a representation is impinged upon and the detention order is vitiated: High court of J&K and Ladakh
The only right guaranteed to a detenu is of making an effective representation against the order of detention. Such an effective representation can
Matters relating to arbitral awards do not attract any grounds for interference: The High Court of Delhi
In a separate suit filed in the Delhi High Court, under the purview of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, the judges opined that in the matters
There is no element of permanence connected to the term ‘resides’ under the Hindu Marriage Act : The High Court of Calcutta
The court interpreted Section 126(1)(b) and implied that is a proceeding under Section 125 of the Hindu Marriage Act may be taken against any perso
Impairment of credibility for the prosecution side due to non-examination of any independent witness: The High Court of Calcutta
The Delhi High court, in its recent judgment, gave a verdict that non-examination of any independent witness culminated in hampering the credibilit
No second FIR and no new investigation for the same cognizable offence: The High Court of Delhi
In a suit filed under the purview of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, the Delhi High Court held that the court shall not ente
