Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Holding simultaneous inquiry, either during investigation or post submission of final report under Section 173(2) CrPC is incomprehensible under the Code of Criminal Procedure – High Court of Punjab and Haryana.
Holding simultaneous inquiry, either during investigation or post submission of final report under Section 173(2) CrPC is incomprehensible under the Code of Criminal Procedure – High Court of Punjab and Haryana.
December 2, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Holding simultaneous inquiry, either during investigation or post submission of final report under Section 173(2) CRPC is incomprehensible under th

To issue order or direction thereby directing the opposite parties to continue the police protection to the petitioner for the security of his life and property.
To issue order or direction thereby directing the opposite parties to continue the police protection to the petitioner for the security of his life and property.
December 2, 2021by Primelegal Team0

To issue order or direction thereby directing the opposite parties to continue the police protection to the petitioner for the security of his life

If the punishment appears to be grossly disproportionate to the acts complained of or if it shocks the conscience of the court, the court may interfere with the punishment awarded.: Meghalaya High Court
December 2, 2021by Primelegal Team0

In the limited scope of judicial review exercised in respect of matters of the present kind, the court cannot supplant its discretion in place of t

What constitutes inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has not been laid down as the Code is silent on this issue.: Meghalaya High Court
December 2, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The High Court has got ample power to exercise its inherent jurisdiction when it comes to righting a wrong for securing ends of justice and also to

The burden of proof lies upon the respondent to establish the charge of cruelty; it has a very wide purview and differs in every other matrimonial case -High court of New Delhi
December 2, 2021by Primelegal Team0

The burden of proof lies upon the respondent to establish the charge of cruelty; it has a very wide purview and differs in every other matrimonial

The Divorce Act may be an independent proceeding but the Magistrate cannot ignore the maintenance awarded in any other legal proceedings: High Court Of Chhattisgarh
The Divorce Act may be an independent proceeding but the Magistrate cannot ignore the maintenance awarded in any other legal proceedings: High Court Of Chhattisgarh
December 2, 2021by Primelegal Team0

It cannot be laid down as a proposition of law that once an order of maintenance has been passed by any Court then the same cannot be re-adjudicate

The compensation amount of land must be decided in accordance with the market value of the land: Orissa High Court
December 2, 2021by Primelegal Team0

It was found that all the reasons to extend benefits to the present Appellants (Claimants) in the matter of determination of compensation for their

Willful disobedience by the contemnor undermining the dignity and authority of the Courts and outraging the majesty of law shall be punishable in the court of law: High Court of New Delhi.
December 1, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Willful disobedience by the contemnor undermining the dignity and authority of the Courts and outraging the majesty of law shall be punishable in

Rule 41 (5) of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 would not apply to the transfer of a non-teaching staff: Bombay High Court
Rule 41 (5) of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 would not apply to the transfer of a non-teaching staff: Bombay High Court
December 1, 2021by Primelegal Team0

Rule 41 (5) would not apply to the transfer from a junior college to secondary school though run by the same Management in case of non-teaching sta

If the assessment is being reopened after expiry of 4 years from the relevant assessment year, it will be time-barred unless the assessee had failed to disclose material facts that were necessary for the assessment: Bombay High Court
If the assessment is being reopened after expiry of 4 years from the relevant assessment year, it will be time-barred unless the assessee had failed to disclose material facts that were necessary for the assessment: Bombay High Court
December 1, 2021by Primelegal Team0

There must be a cogent and clear indication in the reasons supplied, that in fact there was a failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully