Primelegal Team, Author at Prime Legal Law Firm

Appellate Court rightly appreciated that the Respondent has a right to live at her husband’s co-owned property: High Court of Delhi

High Court stood with the decision of the Appellate Court rightly that the Respondent has a right to live at her husband’s co-owned property and

The order on sentence dated 28th January, 2016 is modified to the sentence for the period already undergone by the appellant: High Court Of Delhi

Considering the age of the appellant/accused at the time of offence, non-involvement in any other criminal case, and his conduct in jail during inc

The petitioner was at best consuming narcotics drugs which he used to buy from the sellers in the group: High Court Of Delhi

It is directed that the petitioner be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ₹1 lakh with two surety bonds of the like

FITNESS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INCLUDED IN ENTRY NO. 106 OF SCHEDULE II(B) OF UTTARAKHAND VAT ACT,2005: THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

In this Commercial tax revision No. 12 of 2013, the revisionist is challenging the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Sect

THE PETITIONERS WOULD BE ABSORBED WITH THE CPWD ONCE A NOTIFICATION UNDER S.10 OF THE CLRA COMES TO BE ISSUED: THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI

The Civil Writ Petition 18013 of 2004 in the case of Vijay Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI has allowed the wri

Petitioner should be granted bail from the Judicial custody as nothing has been recovered in the form of contraband or money : High Court of Delhi

Petitioner is in judicial custody since 14.03.2015, he is admitted to bail on furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one surety i

It is a fit case for a remit to the Tribunal on the limited extent of the grant of recovery rights against the appellant : High Court of Delhi

Parties shall appear before the tribunal for directions and tribunal shall have endeavour to conclude the recording of evidence on the limited aspe

For granting bail u/s 37 of the NDPS Act, it has to be prima facie shown that the accused is not guilty: High Court of Delhi

It has to be shown prima facie that the accused is not guilty of such offence and also that there is an embargo u/s 37 of the NDPS Act in granting

The consent of a woman with respect to Section 375 must involve an active and reasoned deliberation towards the proposed act: High Court of Delhi

The court must very carefully examine whether the accused had actually wanted to marry the victim, or had mala fide motives, and had made a false p

A person declared as proclaimed offender in terms of Section 82 Cr.P.C., is not entitled to the relief of anticipatory bail: High Court of Delhi

If any Court has reason to believe that any person against whom a warrant has been issued by it has absconded or is concealing himself so that such

Blogs And Articles