Court below has not correctly appreciated the evidence on record or that acquittal of the accused has resulted into travesty of justice, upheld by
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh denied a plea from the school principal opposing his or her transfer., is upheld by the High Court of Himachal P
Order. 18 Rule 17 CPC cannot be used to supplement testimony that has already been given, is upheld by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh through
The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judges, Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivatsava and Justice Sameer Jain in the case of Gopal Singh Bareth v
The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judge, Justice Sandeep Mehta and Justice Rameshwar Vyas in the case of Raju @ Rajkumar Through His Bro
The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judges, Justice Sandeep Mehta and Justice Vinod Kumar Bharwani in the case of Fula @ Fulchand v. State
This particular decision is upheld by the Punjab and Haryana High Court through the division bench of Justice Jaishree Thakur in the case of Sa
This particular decision is upheld by the Punjab and Haryana High Court through the division bench of Justice Anil Kshetrapal in the case of Ya
This particular decision is upheld by the Punjab and Haryana High Court through the division bench of Justice Vikash Bahi in the case of Maam Gujja
The Orissa High Court bench of Justice Jaswant Singh and Justice M.S. Raman ruled in the case of M/s. JSW Steel Ltd. v. Union of India (W.P. (C) No
We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.
Prime Legal, 4 No Fairle Place, H
MP House 5TH Floor Room No :501, PIN:700001