The Kerala High Court upheld that because interest is a statutory imposition, the high court does not have the authority to waive payment of intere
The Kerala High Court upheld that because interest is a statutory imposition, the high court does not have the authority to waive payment of intere
The Kerala High Court has upheld that the son-in-law has no right to disrupt his father-in-law’s ownership of his building or property throug
According to the Calcutta High Court, the allegation of custodial torture against one accused in a different case cannot ipso facto raise a presump
According to the Calcutta High Court, the assessee’s evidence cannot be unjustly rejected by the income tax agency. In the case of PCIT vs. S
In the case of Purulia Metal Casting Pvt. Ltd. vs. Asst. Commissioner of State Tax, Purulia Charge &Ors.(W.P.A. 14286 of 2022), the Calcutta Hi
This particular decision is upheld by the Punjab and Haryana High Court through the division bench of Justice Sandeep Moudgil in the case of Mamta
This particular decision is upheld by the Punjab and Haryana High Court through the division bench of Justice Suddhir Mittal in the case of Mehtab
This particular decision is upheld by the Punjab and Haryana High Court through the division bench of Justice Rajesh Bharadwaj in the case of Mani
This particular decision is held by the High Court Of Karnataka through the single bench of Justice M Nagaprasanna in the case of Himanshu Gupta V.
The High Court of Delhi, through learned judge, Justice Pushpendra Kumar Kaurav in the case of Sandeep Walia v. Monica Uppal (CRL.REV.P. 179/2019 &