Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The said Architect served a notice of arbitration to the appellant and immediately, an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC was field before him objecting his appointment as the arbitrator: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The said Architect served a notice of arbitration to the appellant and immediately, an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC was field before him objecting his appointment as the arbitrator: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 18, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Arbitration Appeal is accordingly allowed and disposed of by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of M/S CHOKHI DHANI V. M/S JS CONST

CONTINUE READING
Trial Court was not having power to determine the age of the applicant and this power is vested only with the JJ Board constituted under the Act of 2015: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 18, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 28.05.2021 is hereby set aside by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of SHRIRAM

CONTINUE READING
Unless the service is provided for free or is covered by a contract of personal service, medical services would fall under the purview of Section 2(42) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019: Kerala High Court
Unless the service is provided for free or is covered by a contract of personal service, medical services would fall under the purview of Section 2(42) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019: Kerala High Court
August 18, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Unless the service is provided for free or is covered by a contract of personal service, medical services would fall under the purview of Section 2

CONTINUE READING
If judicial officials make mistakes, the judiciary’s credibility would suffer: Kerala High Court
If judicial officials make mistakes, the judiciary’s credibility would suffer: Kerala High Court
August 18, 2022by Primelegal Team0

If judicial officials make mistakes, the judiciary’s credibility would suffer is upheld by the Kerala High Court in the case of Nahif Ali v.

CONTINUE READING
Chief Wildlife Warden ordered to allow farmers to hunt wild boars: Kerala High Court
Chief Wildlife Warden ordered to allow farmers to hunt wild boars: Kerala High Court
August 18, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Chief Wildlife Warden ordered to allow farmers to hunt wild boars by the Kerala High Court in the case of K.V.Sebastian v. State of Kerala through

CONTINUE READING
Civil Law provides for remedies for alleged arbitrary termination, writ petitions are not maintainable against private universities: Gujarat High Court
August 18, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Gujarat High Court on 5th August 2022 refused to intervene in a writ petition filed by an Assistant Professor against Sabarmati University, a p

CONTINUE READING
In the absence of malafide, the penalty will not be imposed u/s 20(2) of the RTI Act for destroying information sought: Gujarat High Court
August 18, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Gujarat High Court on 16th June 2022 ruled that if any information sought under the Right to Information Act is destroyed and it is not the res

CONTINUE READING
Disputes arising from agreements relating to property used solely for ‘Trade and Commerce’ will constitute “Commercial Disputes”: Gujarat High Court
August 18, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Gujarat High Court on 10th June 2022 ruled that the key factor in determining whether a property dispute is a “commercial dispute” under th

CONTINUE READING
According to the Orissa High Court, the Human Rights Commission may only “recommend” compensation under Section 18 of the Protection of Human Rights Act.
August 17, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In the case of State of Odisha & Ors. v. Radhakanta Tripathy & Anr. (Case No.: W.P.(C) No. 38923 of 2020 Order Dated: 29th June 2022), acco

CONTINUE READING
Orissa High Court rules that there is no legal requirement to add two years to the upper age limit determined by the “ossification test”
Orissa High Court rules that there is no legal requirement to add two years to the upper age limit determined by the “ossification test”
August 17, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In the case of Gobardhan Gadaba @ Gadava v. State of Odisha(Case No.: CRLREV No. 247 of 2007). According to the Orissa High Court, there is no lega

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.